Posted on 07/22/2021 12:31:31 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said Thursday on ABC’s “The View” that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) was right to block House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s (R-CA) picks of Reps. Jim Banks (R-IN) and Jim Jordan (R-OH) from Serving on January 6 Committee.
Co-host Sunny Hostin said, “We were talking earlier about Speaker Pelosi rejecting two of minority leader McCarthy’s appointments, Jim Jordan and Jim Banks, to investigate the Capitol riots. What do you think about Pelosi’s just unprecedented decision?
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
What exactly is acceptable for a Representative to represent, if not his constituents?
There’s a lot of people who disagree with you, Chucky.
Blah blah - I blindly defend my party’s rise to power - screw America.
Those who already believe Trump is guilty should be removed from the committee too!
Furthermore, neither you or Pelosi should be "Majority" anything!
You would disqualify all of the Democrats, and half of the Republicans.
Yeah, that’s what they’re afraid of.
Besides ‘they’ think biden is president.
Just like 75 million other Americans.
The Democrats want none of those informed, probing questions to screw up their cheap and superficial inquiry.
The View
Is the show indoctrination to idiocy, or are the people that watch it already lost?
Jerry Springer, The View, Pelosi, Kamel-Toe . . .
Like Midas Mulligan, watching and waiting.
When the lights finally go out in New York, we’ll know it’s time to come back, to begin afresh, a new world.
Until then . . . prepare.
Chuck Tumor and Nazi Pelosi are the primary examples of why we need term limits for Congre$$.
I thought I heard this morning that Pelosi said he reason for dropping Jordan at least was because she expected him to be called as a witness. I don’t know if that’s a convenient excuse or a real reason.
He sure can!
So Pelosi’s people on this committee all share one thing: they hate Trump. With that said, they don’t qualify!
Opposing views are not allowed in the Star Chamber.
What is his point? After the 2016 election, he thought Hillary should really be president.
If the criteria are that we disqualify people for thinking the candidate of their political party should be president, then we wouldn’t have anyone left in politics, or in Congress.
And what about when Stacey Abrams weighs in on the issues of the day? She never conceded her election loss in Georgia. Based on Chuck’s criteria, she should never be allowed to weigh in on anything, because she thinks she should be governor. Heck, for all we know Chuck Schumer thinks Stacey should be the governor. Are these really key criteria for determining who belongs in politics or on a committee to study an issue?
You can’t have representatives voting as they see fit without being branded as a terrorist and being investigated criminally.... sheesh. /s
Well?
You said Stacey Abrams should “weigh in.”
No thanks.
I can’t wait until Jim Jordan is Speaker of the House.
Some day...
Simply because they believe Trump should be president? Let’s talk about all the stuff that AOC believes .......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.