Posted on 07/20/2021 7:38:48 PM PDT by MNDude
Recipients of the one-shot Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine may need to get a second dose to protect against the Delta and Lambda coronavirus variants because its less effective against them, a new study suggests, per The New York Times.
"The message that we wanted to give was not that people shouldn't get the J&J vaccine, but we hope that in the future, it will be boosted with either one dose of J&J or a booster with [the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines]," Nathaniel Landau, a virologist at New York University's Grossman School of Medicine who led the study, told the Times.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
Isn’t Pfizer seeking FDA permission for a booster for their recipients also?
and yet if you websearch you’ll find that J&J’s vaccine is reported to have very good protection against the Delta variant.
Meanwhile the Democratic congressmen all had the Pfizer one I’m sure and ... well, see how that’s working for them?
What bullshit. These idiots have no idea what they are reading from the data.
So the vaccine is NOT effective.
Hmmmm.
Is the ‘booster’ a different/ mutated viral gene that is being introduced into the human subject’s cells?
If so does the testing re-start with phase 1? If not, why not?
JJ is the only one I’d take if a gun was pointed at my head. At least it’s a traditional vaccine, if I understand correctly.
The other 2 are new mRNA technologies slopped together in 6 months.
Yes they are.
Israel is moving towards going with the third shot.
https://www.ynetnews.com/health_science/article/bytq34n0u
This and other COVID news plus other news on my daily news summary....https://nextrushfree.blogspot.com/2021/07/news-summary-intelligence-report_20.html
“ The FDA made an awful decision to temporarily pull back Johnson & Johnson coronavirus vaccine distribution, Former President Donald Trump shared with “Hannity” in an exclusive interview on Monday.
“I think it’s very suspect as what they did with Johnson & Johnson,” he said. “Because the only people that are happy about that are Pfizer and Moderna… What they did is a terrible, terrible thing.”
The J&J vaccinations were paused after reports of blood clots in patients began to surface. According to the CDC, this side effect is “extremely rare” which supports Trump’s argument that the FDA may be playing favorite.” - Fox
“The message that we wanted to give was not that people shouldn’t get the J&J vaccine, but we hope that in the future, it will be boosted with either one dose of J&J or a booster with [the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines],”
—
That sounds scientific. Sort of a cocktail mix of vaccines.
A shot of J&J with a splash of Modena and two olives, please.
J recipients?
New covid slang for this new fad of virus?
And what comes after the “Delta Variant”.......probably just before the 2022 elections...?
“They,” whoever they are, will try to milk this fake pandemic as long as we the people will continue to fall for the “bullshit!” The tyrants continue to feel the thrill of power over BILLIONS of people. As long as we fall for the “Dr. Fauci” NIH, CDC, Big Pharm, Jobama Biteme and crowd, we will be in their grip.
Time to call an end to this game. While we are focused on the “pandemic,” thousands of illegals are crossing our border.
Let’s put a stop to their game and decertify the election of 2020, after proving the fraud, that has been foisted upon us.
the fascist left just makes this BS up on the fly and “science” ...
...”the conclusions are at odds with those from smaller studies published by Johnson & Johnson earlier this month suggesting that a single dose of the vaccine is effective against the variant even eight months after inoculation.
“The new study has not yet been peer reviewed nor published in a scientific journal, and relied on laboratory experiments...
“...Small studies published by researchers affiliated with J&J suggested that the vaccine was only slightly less effective against the delta variant than against the original virus, and that antibodies stimulated by the vaccine grew in strength over eight months.
“Landau’s team would probably have seen a similar increase in the vaccine’s potency if they had looked at the data over time, said Dan Barouch, a virologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. The data on the J&J vaccine’s strength against the delta variant at Day 29 is not much different from those reported in his own study, Barouch said.
Safety and Efficacy of Single-Dose Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine against Covid-19
“...Vaccine efficacy was higher against severe–critical Covid-19 (76.7% [adjusted 95% CI, 54.6 to 89.1] for onset at ≥14 days and 85.4% [adjusted 95% CI, 54.2 to 96.9] for onset at ≥28 days).”
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2101544
“...The J&J/Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine was 66.3% effective in clinical trials (efficacy) at preventing laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection in people who received the vaccine and had no evidence of being previously infected. People had the most protection 2 weeks after getting vaccinated.
In the clinical trials, the vaccine had high efficacy at preventing hospitalization and death in people who did get sick. No one who got COVID-19 at least 4 weeks after receiving the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine had to be hospitalized....”
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/janssen.html
J&J $10
Others $40-$70
And that there is why Pfizer and Moderna were happy
If I was forced to take one of these trans-Genic experimental cocktails, it would be the JnJ. I think the adenovirus vector is more stable and selective the the lipid globules that are a pass key through all cell membranes.
But all of these are a hard pass for me. The risk is truly unwarranted for most people. (Healthy & under 60)
The vaccine industry is pure evil and fraudulent
The “ immunization “ theory is garbage. Complete utter poppycock
Easily provable
Started AGES AGO.
“Vaccinations only prove that you can inject someone
with highly acidic toxic poisonous chemicals and that person
hopefully surviving the debilitating side effects, such as multiple
sclerosis, lesions on the brain, paralysis, breakdown of the red
and white blood cells, ulcerations of the liver, lung, kidney, pancreas,
stomach and bowels, seizures and death. Vaccinations provide
zero immunity. True immunity that leads to health and fitness
can only be achieved by making healthy lifestyle and dietary choices.”
1955 American Cancer Society advertising circular states ‘cancer will strike one of every four persons now living. More children from 3 to 15 years of age die of cancer than from any other disease.’ (50 years before, cancer was unheard of in children). According to the ACS, they are predicting 6.4 million deaths from cancer, compared with 128,000 in 1933–an increase of 6.2 million cases in 22 years. Vaccination, pesticide use and chemical pollution are the main factors that have increased since 1933.
1955 Despite the sky rocketing cases of vaccine-induced polio, the AMA, NFIP and USPHS claim a reduction of 40-50%.
1955 Idaho brings its Salk vaccination program to a halt on July 1, 1955.
Utah does the same on July 12, 1955.
1955 Boston Herald newspaper reports on April 18, 1955, features an article entitled ‘Drug Companies Expecting Big Profit on Salk Vaccine’, which stated. ‘A spokesman for Parke-Davis, which made 50% of the Salk vaccine, said ‘now that it has been declared safe, we can get back the millions we invested in the development of the Salk vaccine and make a profit out of it. Our company will made over $10 million on Salk vaccine in 1955.’
1955 Rhodes and Company, Wall Street brokers specializing in drug securities, estimate that the gross revenue of the six vaccine houses licensed to produce and sell Salk vaccine would be about $60 million, with profits of $20 million.
1955 The CIA conducts a biological warfare experiment in the Tampa Bay area in Florida with agents withdrawn from an Army CBW center. A sharp rise in whooping cough (Pertussis) cases occurs, including 12 deaths, following the test.
1955 Washington Bureau of the Detroit Free Press reports, on June 3, 1955, that ‘The USPHS reported that more children who received Salk shots made by the Wyeth Labs suffered polio more than could normally be expected;’
1955 AMA Conference in Atlantic City, New Jersey. Article by James C. Spaulding who covered the conference was published in the AMA Journal, June 19,
1955, ‘A policy of secrecy and deception has been followed by the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis and the US Public Health Service in the polio vaccine programs. The nation’s physicians were prevented from learning vital information about the trouble with Salk vaccine. The US Public Health Service had an advisory group made up almost entirely of scientists who were receiving money from the National Foundation of Infantile Paralysis, which was exerting pressure to go ahead with the program even after Salk vaccine was found to be dangerous.’ Spaulding further said, ‘the Infantile Paralysis Foundation kept secret the fact that live virus was detected in four out of six supposedly ‘finished and safe’ lots of vaccine.’
1955 Salk Polio Vaccine again used in the US. Cases of polio skyrocket again in the United States.
1955 Reported that doctors on the staff of the National Institutes for Health are avoiding vaccination of their children with the Salk vaccine, and that after experimenting with 1200 monkeys, they declared the Salk vaccine worthless as a preventative and a danger to take.
1955 First vaccinated generation become adolescents.
1955 Massachusetts reports 642% increase in polio since vaccinations began in 1954 with vaccination of 130,000 children. In response, the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis states that the increase in cases was due to the fact that ‘no children were vaccinated there.’
1955 Massachusetts bans the sale of Salk vaccine.’
1955 Dr. Graham W. Wilson, director of Britain’s Public Health Laboratory Service, who knew about the NIH Salk vaccine trials, says ‘I do not see how any vaccine prepared by Salk’s method can be guaranteed safe.’
1955 US Surgeon General Scheele admits in a closed session of the AMA that ‘Salk polio vaccine is hard to make and no batch can be proven safe before given to children’. Despite this fact, the public is told that the vaccine is safe. The government announces that it has the intention to vaccinate 57 million people before August 1955.
1955 Surgeon General Scheele (who never practiced medicine a day in his life!) goes on public radio saying ‘I have complete confidence in the Salk vaccine. I urge doctors to continue vaccinations.’
1956 Seventeen states in the United States reject their government-supplied Salk polio vaccine.
1956 US government appropriates $53.6 million to ‘aid states in providing free vaccine to people under 20 years of age’.
1956 Idaho health director Peterson states that polio only struck vaccinated children in areas where there had been no cases of polio since the preceding autumn. In 90% of the cases, the paralysis occurred in the arm in which the vaccine had been injected.
1956 American Public Health Service announces 168 cases of polio and 6 deaths among those vaccinated. Censorship is then imposed on the reporting of reactions to Salk vaccine.
1956 Oral polio vaccine developed further by Sabin.
1956 The US Public Health Service and the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis (Rockefeller) put on a drive to ‘sell’ Salk polio vaccine to the public.
1957 Governor Knight of California asks the legislature for $3 million in order to insure vaccination for all those under 40 years old with Salk polio vaccine. The newspapers report that corporate profits from the Salk vaccine will be in excess of $5 billion. (Feb 6, 1957). Governor Knight notes there are 4 million Californians under 40 and signs the bill.
1957 Pertussis vaccination programs exist in all industrialized nations, with the US leading the way. The vaccine is promoted as ‘risk free’.
Yes in our family my husband and I opted for the J and J and our 18 year old son did too (his college is requiring vaccination). A more traditional vaccine. Our 16 year old daughter is unvaccinated so far as all 3 options look bad for her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.