Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yardstick

Makes you wonder why they didn’t just do that from the beginning.


26 posted on 07/18/2021 8:12:13 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: marron

Yep, it does. My guess is the mRNA type could be developed more quickly.

In hindsight, they probably should have developed a traditional vaccine in parallel. That way if the new type failed, there would be a fallback, albeit with possibly delayed delivery. And of course it would be acceptable to the large slice of the population that has turned out to be wary of the new type.


49 posted on 07/18/2021 8:36:44 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: marron

Because they invented the “vaccine” first, then the disease. This was a money/power ploy all along. Over a trillion dollars spent with not a lot to show for it except RICH Pharma Execs and shareholders.


68 posted on 07/18/2021 9:00:17 AM PDT by BipolarBob (You may love gravity but gravity does not love you back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson