It’s long but I encourage everyone to read the whole article. Like a lot of issues the two sides gravitate to emotions and abandon logic. Here on FR we tend to side with the “hoax” or “Hot Air” view. That leaves the other side the freedom to claim “science” is on their side and it is settled. As this author says we and others of like mind need to use reason and science to point out that AGW is far from scientific fact and why, while at the same time showing that the costs involved will never be justified politically or economically.
We do.
while at the same time showing that the costs involved will never be justified politically or economically.
We have.
This is nothing new. Actual respected scientists inside the environmental movement have done all of these things and they have been ignored for decades because reality does not matter. Only the acquisition of power to the few matters.
Heck the people pushing climate change do not even believe it has is shown by their actions.
Does the author even understand that?
So what do you do at that point?
Realistically.
Suggested reading for you and author The wolf and the lamb in Aesop's Fables.