By listening to the Cyber Ninjas CEO, if they had everything they needed from the county, they could likely pin this right down to individuals. They would know which tabulator operators did things. With USPS digital images, they'd know where fraud ballots came from.
“if they had everything they needed from the county, they could likely pin this right down to individuals.”
I think you’re right. I inferred from Mr. Cotton’s testimony that if the County were to turn over the “splunk” (???) logs, they could get detailed info. Someone tried to delete this info one day by spamming the one log with thousands of queries to make Election Night data drop off the system. If I understand right, even though that spamming pushed out the data as to what person(s) did the dirty work, the splunk log would show it. I could be wrong.
(And they wonder why the County won’t turn over everything.(