The Constitution guarantees we the people a Republican form of government.
We elect representatives to represent us in our federal and state governments.
Take your basic argumentum absurdem. If it is conclusively established that Biden was “awarded” every vote cast in the 2020 elections except 323 votes across the United States and the fraud proven incontrovertibly then what remedy?
Ignore the theft of our President and his Presidency?
One approach: all pubbie states sue the Dem wastewater states and poof: Original jurisdiction with Scotus.
As happens in such cases the Scotus can appoint a special master to marshal the evidence, states can make their pleadings, all with a view to prove the election was stolen.
Simple principles of justice demand that the entire country be granted governance by their elected leader and the not the cabal of thieves and traitors, foreign and domestic be arrested and tried and after a fair trial, hung by their necks until dead.
Also you could add the Quo Warranto? Motion to allow Biden to prove he has the right to be in that office and with the overwhelming proof off fraud his failure again demands his removal and the winner of the election be installed.
Otherwise we have lost our representative republic.
Courts can draw on equity principles and unclean hands apply here but not laches.
One such principle is perhaps of interest ...
“There is no wrong without a remedy.” ;-)
I’ve got more but its late and and almost worse then the Dems, the uniparty, the never-trumpers, the deep state, etc., I assume you’re a Trumper who has given up even though EVERYBODY knows the election was stolen.
John Paul Jones? “We have not yet begun to fight!”
or words to that effect.
Night.
God bless and preserve our United States of America.
“As happens in such cases the Scotus can appoint a special master”
“all pubbie states sue the Dem wastewater states and poof: Original jurisdiction with Scotus.”
Sadly, SCOTUS has sold out to the commies; we can’t count on them ever again.
If only SCOTUS would uphold their own ruling in 1878: “FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING”. It set the precedent to fix this mess, but it seems that none of the attorneys are going there when it’s as clear as day.
“Also you could add the Quo Warranto?”
That’s what Mike Lindell is counting on. I understand it has been used successfully, but never at such a high level as the U.S. Presidency. There’s always a first time.
Drawing a parallel to the dire times of John Paul Jones was the intent of my post you responded to ...
Please inform us of the constitutional sections and clauses whereby the USSC would exercise authority over a POTUS election, authority so plenary they can overturn the certified result of the electoral college and US Congress.