Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tell It Right

I was scoffing about the Mark of the Beast because of taking Revelation literally, and it may yet get to that. The forehead or hand thing. But this is definitely part of it.


19 posted on 07/14/2021 11:11:28 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Luke21
IMHO it's healthy for us Christians to have respectful debates about the items in Revelation (and other eschatological books in the Bible) such as which are literal and which are figurative, what they mean, when they'll happen, etc.


But in doing so we shouldn't lose sight of sticking to the core principles of those teachings when they happen right in plain sight. So even if the mark of the beast is something else completely different from vax passports, will happen later, or (as I think it is) is more of a creed than an actual mark, we should still operate faithfully when we have little "marks" the worldly people demand we put on.


So even if the mark of the beast isn't the requirement of some states that all obgyn's perform abortions, people in that industry should stick to Christian values as though it is the mark and we are living in the end times. Likewise with a work requirement that you pledge your allegiance to LGBTQPEDO, etc.


It does two things. A: It makes it harder to implement a real mark of the beast policy if we Christians stand our ground on the little marks policies, and B: they are like warm ups for us Christians to prepare us to stick to Jesus if we're living during the real mark of the beast persecution times.

22 posted on 07/14/2021 11:37:50 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson