Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pornhub claims immunity after video shared of Alabama teen’s alleged rape
AL.com ^ | 07-08-2021 | Howard Koplowitz

Posted on 07/09/2021 4:30:11 AM PDT by boycott

Pornhub asked a Birmingham federal judge on Wednesday to dismiss a lawsuit brought by an Alabama teen who claims she was raped and that the incident was posted to the adult website, claiming the company is immune to liability for what third parties post to the platform.

MindGeek, Pornhub’s parent company, said it was entitled to so-called Section 230 immunity, which it said gives Internet companies “broad immunity from liability for content posted to its websites by third parties.”

(Excerpt) Read more at al.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alabama; internet; lawsuit; pornhub; rape; section230
"Section 230 immunity" is a pile of bs.

Pornhub, Facebook, Twitter, Google, all of them need to be held accountable.

1 posted on 07/09/2021 4:30:11 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: boycott

distant eugenics...it’s free


2 posted on 07/09/2021 4:33:35 AM PDT by PGalt (Past Peak Civilization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott

I cant see how a these porn web site that advertize videos on incest, sleeping with your step mother and rape is going to claim immunity of real rape, It too bad we have no real leaders to stand up and really do something about this crap other than talk.


3 posted on 07/09/2021 4:40:26 AM PDT by The MAGA-Deplorian (Democrats are lawless because Republicans are ball-less)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott

Pornhub is as slimy organization but if they are truly a neutral platform, are not a “publisher”, do not filter the posts of others who post on their site then their claim may stand, 230 may stand.

A win for them would be bad news for the likes of Facebook and Twitter who clearly “publish”. We can deal with Pornhub later!


4 posted on 07/09/2021 4:45:23 AM PDT by WellyP (question!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The MAGA-Deplorian

True.

I also believe Trump’s lawyers should use this case against Facebook, Twitter, Google, etc. Make it a case against Pornhub.

Why should Facebook, Twitter, and Google be given immunity not given to Pornhub? Trump’s lawyers should compare/equate their 230 immunity to that of Pornhub. Make them have to defend Pornhub’s position. It won’t go over so well with most people.


5 posted on 07/09/2021 4:46:05 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: boycott

I thought there was supposed to be legal documentation of consent (including age) for the “actors” making these videos?

For porn, I think that would be especially important as it is not always clear what is fantasy or reality.


6 posted on 07/09/2021 4:48:33 AM PDT by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

A win for them would be bad news for the likes of Facebook and Twitter who clearly “publish”.

Exactly. Section 230 needs to go under the microscope.


7 posted on 07/09/2021 4:48:36 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: boycott

All that has to happen is the Republicans take back congress AND the senate.


8 posted on 07/09/2021 5:04:01 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (I got the shot. Not because I wanted to. Because I had to, in violation of my civil rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Agree. It’s a shame they didn’t get it done before. I guess the demos and libs created so much crisis when Trump was president with the Russia BS they never got around to doing it. Or maybe there’s some RINOs that just didn’t care to get it done.


9 posted on 07/09/2021 5:13:14 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: boycott

But according to left wingers, it’s perfectly fine to sue gun manufactures for all the gun violence in ChiCongo. By their logic, web content should be the same as bullets.


10 posted on 07/09/2021 5:16:12 AM PDT by Flavious_Maximus (Fauci is a fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

“Pornhub is as slimy organization but if they are truly a neutral platform, are not a “publisher”, do not filter the posts of others who post on their site then their claim may stand, 230 may stand.”

a horrific case. slimy site.

but . . .

Their argument for Section 230 protection is as legitimate/illegitimate as any other.

The Law needs to be changed. This is just an over-the-top, and truly awful case to do it.


11 posted on 07/09/2021 5:31:12 AM PDT by Macoozie (Handcuffs and Orange Jumpsuitss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: boycott
The problem is without 230 immunity, sites like this one would have to shutter. 230 doesn't just protect the big commercial social media sites. It protects all social media, including political forums like this one.

People who advocate for the repeal of 230 haven't thought this through. Without it, any time a commenter here said something defamatory about anyone, the operator of this site - be it a corporation or person depending on its ownership framework - would be exposed to defamation litigation.

12 posted on 07/09/2021 5:55:58 AM PDT by ScubaDiver (Reddit refugee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott

I put the blame squarely on Paul Ryan.


13 posted on 07/09/2021 6:02:04 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (I got the shot. Not because I wanted to. Because I had to, in violation of my civil rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

I thought so too. Perhaps that’s just for ‘commercial’ pornographers.

In any event, I believe this case predates PornHub’s ‘new’ policies which they famously implemented sometime last year, purging hundreds of thousands of videos submitted to the site ‘anonymously.’ It’s hard to believe that was allowed from the beginning. It was an invitation for criminal behavior to flourish.

To upload now requires a ‘verified’ account. I have no idea how verified those accounts really are or if they have someway of documenting the age of the ‘actors.’ If they don’t, that seems like an enormous loophole that either Congress and/or the states should close, immediately.

I’m also not sure where Pornhub’s servers are located. If it’s outside the US, it may be harder to regulate without banning the domain altogether.


14 posted on 07/09/2021 6:02:51 AM PDT by ScubaDiver (Reddit refugee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

You mean like the last time the GOP held all 3 branches and removed funding for public tv, Planned Parenthood, the Dept of Education, etc?


15 posted on 07/09/2021 6:30:48 AM PDT by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Oshkalaboomboom

“You mean like the last time the GOP held all 3 branches and removed funding for public tv, Planned Parenthood, the Dept of Education, etc?”

I put the blame on Paul Ryan.


17 posted on 07/09/2021 11:24:18 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (I got the shot. Not because I wanted to. Because I had to, in violation of my civil rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

I put the blame on Paul Ryan.


Don’t. The GOP is institutionally corrupt and has no interest in governing in a MAGA manner.


18 posted on 07/09/2021 11:26:29 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

You mean like the last time the GOP held all 3 branches and removed funding for public tv, Planned Parenthood, the Dept of Education, etc?
————————————————————————

Exactly….they won’t do a damn thing to change the bullshit passed by the Demoncrats


19 posted on 07/09/2021 11:29:14 AM PDT by Hogblog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: boycott

Wait till they do this with Bidens videos he uploaded.
They will take them down quick if Biden wants them gone.


20 posted on 07/09/2021 3:01:33 PM PDT by minnesota_bound (I need more money. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson