[lightman]

“So Pew is reinforcing the story line, carried by all the Left, but most importantly by the Wall Street Journal, that it was suburban voters who propelled Biden’s win. “

I have reluctantly come to the unfortunate and dismal conclusion that the election—if it was merely close and not overwhelmingly stolen (AND I BELIEVE IT WAS STOLEN...I’M FROM PENNSYLVANIA!)—became a referendum on COVID response.

“Safety” vs. freedom.

Maskers vs. non-maskers.

Hula hoop circles vs. airport rallies.

The Karens and Gavins “won”.

[nicollo]

I have reluctantly come to the unfortunate and dismal conclusion that the election—if it was merely close and not overwhelmingly stolen (AND I BELIEVE IT WAS STOLEN...I’M FROM PENNSYLVANIA!)—became a referendum on COVID response.

From Pee-yoo's own data, while "suburban" votes were up for Dims, it was the urban fraud that pushed the state totals, as there was a coincidental increase in "rural" and Latin voters for Trump that offest those gains. So it's still an urban machine problem, not a turn in suburban voters (which, yes, did happen).

I think you may agree with me that the urban vote does not represent "Karens" -- and instead is just a name on a ballot that represents no voter intent, and, likely, multiple times.

Note that GA, AZ and WI had larger impact of Af-Am votes on the outcomes than PA. That tells me that the PA Dem machine was long practicing this fraud, and that the ballot harvesting went outwards from there. If the PA Senate wants to know what happened, it should look for ballot harvesting and other anomalies in the counties surrounding the urban cores of Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.