Posted on 07/03/2021 5:27:17 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
The professional networking platform LinkedIn has deleted the personal account of Dr. Robert Malone, who helped create some of the mRNA technology used in the COVID-19 vaccine, after he raised questions over the possible risks involved in administering it to individuals younger than 18.
“My business pays for LinkedIn premium. I have been deleted,” Malone announced in a recent tweet. “Purchased a service from linked in to promote my company. This is very different from the YouTube or Twitter terms.
The scientist added that the action taken is “arbitrary and capricious” and has “damaged our business, and we deserve to be compensated.”
“He was given no notice, no warnings,” Just The News quoted his wife, Jill Malone, as saying. “He has a 10-15-year-old account — has never even had a warning. 6,000 followers.”
In his Twitter thread on Wednesday, Malone added, “The historic record of what I have done, stated, figured out (and when) etc. over time is a key part of establishing my credibility and track record as a professional. And that has been erased completely and arbitrarily without warning or explanation.”
Last week, Malone had cautioned adolescents about being vaccinated as many public and private universities are mandating vaccines for the next school year and reports have emerged linking the vaccine to heart inflammation.
A representative from Microsoft-owned LinkedIn told Malone that his account had violated its user agreement by posting “misleading or inaccurate information” about vaccines and COVID-19, according to The Epoch Times.
“[O]ne of my concerns are that the government is not being transparent with us about what those risks are. And so, I am of the opinion that people have the right to decide whether to accept vaccines or not, especially since these are experimental vaccines,” Malone said on Fox News' “Tucker Carlson Tonight” on June 23.
He emphasized that the vaccines are not officially approved by the FDA but are administered under emergency use authorization.
“This is a fundamental right having to do with clinical research ethics,” he continued. “And so, my concern is that I know that there are risks. But we don't have access to the data and the data haven't been captured rigorously enough so that we can accurately assess those risks. And therefore … we don't really have the information that we need to make a reasonable decision.”
Google-owned YouTube also recently deleted a video showing a podcast where Malone and others discussed concerns with the COVID-19 vaccines.
Malone said he has a “bias that the benefits probably don’t outweigh the risks” for younger Americans receiving the vaccine, but said the risk-benefit analysis is not being done.
Malone said there is a “pretty good chance” that the risk-benefit ratio for those 18 years old and younger “doesn’t justify vaccination in these very young adults.”
Malone said his understanding is that the CDC is “overwhelmed” and waiting on data from other countries to come in before making its decisions.
“I think that what we have is a structural problem in how the databases were built and how they are being analyzed,” he continued.
Data show that children who have COVID-19 are very unlikely to suffer heavily or require hospitalization, though the CDC recommends everyone who is eligible and older than 12 get the vaccine because “widespread vaccination is a critical tool to help stop the pandemic.”
That was one of the reasons I got off of Facebook, people were wondering why I wasn’t liking their posts.
I might have looked at it a half dozen times in the past few years.
there is only one reason to do this.
to continue LIES, FRAUD, DECEPTION, PLANDEMIC MURDER
and DEPOPULATION.
not good.
and there is no accountability by anyone
only future burdens on those injected
without informed consent taken.
I don’t publicly post on LinkedIn and don’t even privately message much.
It’s a Resume place and that is how I use it. My network of business associates isn’t going to do a lot to land me a job but it won’t strike against me either (they are in different fields).
Why should we be expected to stand up to Big Brother on this issue ?
We roll over to the big boy on every other issue.
“according to The Epoch Times.” How accurate is that? Microsoft using a “conservative” source to terminate a client?
“I don’t publicly post on LinkedIn and don’t even privately message much.
It’s a Resume place and that is how I use it. My network of business associates isn’t going to do a lot to land me a job but it won’t strike against me either (they are in different fields).”
You don’t get it. You don’t have to post or do a darn thing on the site. If the LinkedIn gets a complaint about you they will take you off regardless of site activity on your part. You could be a fiddlestick maker but if they don’t like your politics, no promotion of your fiddlestick making processes for you on LinkedIn.
Linkedin had a good idea but that site is a complete waste of time now. Mostly just self promoting idiots pumping moronic ideas.
I dumped my LinkedIn account years ago. You could see it coming from a long way off.
I remember when science was never settled and inquiry and dissent were welcome.
Today “science” is a narrative unrelated to facts and must be protected through woke canceling.
Kunt git a jab if you don’t complu=y
Microsoft had 92% of LinkedIn accounts hacked recently.
Over 700 million accounts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.