Posted on 07/02/2021 6:00:54 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
In America, national, state, and local governments, along with allied companies and colleges, have been laying on the propaganda and pressure for everyone to take experimental coronavirus vaccines, some of which are not even vaccines under the normal meaning of the term. “The vaccines are safe and effective,” is the refrain of the pushers, though there is much reason to doubt that assurance.
At least nobody is forcing us to take the vaccines, Americans may say to themselves for a modicum of relief. But pressure — often supported by government even if implemented by private parties — to take the experimental coronavirus vaccine shots can be intense. Refusal can lead to hardships including being fired from one’s job, refused entry to events, barred from travel, or kicked out of one’s college. Does none of that amount to forcing people to take shots?
In Franklin County, Ohio, there is a government effort regarding which even an extremely talented promoter of the coronavirus experimental vaccines would be smart to just admit, “yeah, that is forcing people to take the shots.” Jake Zuckerman reported this week at the Columbus Dispatch that in Franklin County, the state’s most populous county where the city of Columbus is located, state trial court Judge Richard Frye has imposed, as a condition for probation that allows defendants to avoid incarceration, a requirement that the defendants take experimental coronavirus vaccine shots and submit proof of having done so to the government department overseeing probation.
So here is your choice, Judge Frye is effectively telling defendants, take the shots or be subjected to incarceration with its accompanying extreme deprivation of freedom.
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativeplaybook.com ...
5th Amendment ignored like the rest by the Blackrobes.
The Constitution is DEAD,
SCOTUS is Maltese.
Law died in the DO”J” with the witness executed,
movies of babies being raped by pols, showing at the FIB
when they are not ignoring their own raping children.
all of them ignore the People.
all of them.
Finally, something only criminals have to worry about.
Forcing experimental treatment on individuals was specifically addressed in the permissible experiments section of the Nuremberg Code in 1947. There are graves in our cemeteries of those who fought and died to stop Nazism and to ignore this code is to spit on their graves. I included a link to the Nuremberg Code (http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/) and included some of the more salient points here.
"The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:"
"The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision."
"The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity."
"The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury."
"Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death."
"The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment."
"During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible."
I’ve been to prison before. I can do time.
Our high school district just informed us that if our kids aren’t vaccinated they will be quarantined alone in a room for 10 days doing work assignments with not even Zoom teaching.
We should have NEVER gone down this road. So now it’s The Scarlet Letter for these kids.
Kickass! I’d have a beer with you anyday sir.
More criminality by leftists in black robes.
Move and home school your kids!
Fauxci and birx as well
I took the shots.
I also have no trust in the government and little trust in the CDC.
However, I actually do trust real scientists who work for those “horrid” pharma evil doers.
However, this judge should be tracked, located, cornered, and dealt with in a manner that will be left to the perps. He has NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER to order anyone to take a vaccine.
Really.
Why does this vermin not fear being in public?
And the older you get, life in prison starts to sound pretty good.
Why are people afraid to tell anyone requiring actions which are clearly lawless to “go f**k yourself”? If there ain’t no law there ain’t no crime!
We went from “Two weeks to flatten the curve” to “Not until you show me your papers”.
In one year.
I totally did nazi that coming.
Just on special assignment for security to carry keys for crontractors. But I got to know the routine well enough that I think I could be reasonably comfortable.
Lots of time for naps.
That makes it positively a good place for an old man.
I’m sure this “Nürnberg Law” is really spiffy, but what does US law say about this, can you cite something that actually applies to Americans?
I would be at the next school board meeting with my lawyer. I say this as a former school board chair.
Anyone who doubts the Mark of the Beast won’t eventually happen isn’t paying attention
“movies of babies being raped by pols, showing at the FIB”
Why lie? Is the truth not enough?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.