Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Horowitz: New study shows mask-wearing children at risk for ‘unacceptable’ CO2 levels, cautions against the practice
Theblaze ^ | 7/1/2021 | Daniel Horowitz

Posted on 07/01/2021 6:49:19 PM PDT by bitt

We've spent over a year debating nonexistent evidence that masks effectively protect against the spread of viruses. However, there has been little debate and few published studies on potential harms of mask-wearing, a reality that has allowed zealous maskers to aggressively push their mandate as harmless, with no downside. Well, now we have a randomized controlled trial published in JAMA that raises serious concerns about this practice.

Researchers from Germany conducted a blinded randomized controlled trial of 45 children wearing masks and measured the baseline carbon dioxide levels during inhalation and exhalation behind various masks as compared to the levels of unmasked children. The results are very concerning:

We measured means (SDs) between 13 120 (384) and 13 910 (374) ppm of carbon dioxide in inhaled air under surgical and filtering facepiece 2 (FFP2) masks, which is higher than what is already deemed unacceptable by the German Federal Environmental Office by a factor of 6. This was a value reached after 3 minutes of measurement. Children under normal conditions in schools wear such masks for a mean of 270 (interquartile range, 120-390) minutes. The Figure shows that the value of the child with the lowest carbon dioxide level was 3-fold greater than the limit of 0.2 % by volume. The youngest children had the highest values, with one 7-year-old child's carbon dioxide level measured at 25 000 ppm. (Emphasis added.) Why has nobody in our government bothered to study this before experimenting on children for a virus that doesn't affect them?

The German researchers conclude that there is a concern of mask-wearing causing hypercapnia, and as such, children should not be forced to wear masks: "This leads in turn to impairments attributable to hypercapnia. A recent review concluded that there was ample evidence for adverse effects of wearing such masks.

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: children; co2levels; masks

1 posted on 07/01/2021 6:49:19 PM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...

p


2 posted on 07/01/2021 6:49:32 PM PDT by bitt ( A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Masking of healthy children and school closings are CHILD ABUSE, IMHO.

NEVER AGAIN!


3 posted on 07/01/2021 6:52:06 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

A dumb populace is an easily controlled populace.


4 posted on 07/01/2021 6:52:24 PM PDT by dynachrome ("I will not be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Which is worse - elevated CO2 levels... or the study that demonstrated the horrendous and toxic levels of all sorts of bacteria and other pathogens in those masks - even after relatively short times with them on?


5 posted on 07/01/2021 6:53:35 PM PDT by TheBattman (Democrats-Progressives-Marxists-Socialists - redundant labels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Run an image search on Bing, Duckduckgo, Google and Yandex for:
1. Birds nostrils
2. Mammals nostrils
3. Reptiles nostrils
4. Fish nostrils

None of the images showing animals’ nostrils covered in hair, fur, feathers, or skin. So how did these animals who have shared the earth with humans or their ancestors ever survive? Think about it. We are talking about hundreds of millions of years ALL animals have existed this way.


6 posted on 07/01/2021 6:56:28 PM PDT by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Yawn. This was known over a year ago.

What’s new is what’s growing on those same masks...and it’s no different now than when I labeled it ‘child abuse’ over a year ago.


7 posted on 07/01/2021 7:01:06 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Tucker Carlson did a long segment on this very topic tonight.


8 posted on 07/01/2021 7:01:22 PM PDT by PROCON (Our rights do not come from government, therefore they cannot take them away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

How about unhealthy oxygen levels? OSHA considers anything below 19 percent to be IDLH. There is a hazardous atmosphere behind those masks in more that one way.


9 posted on 07/01/2021 7:13:04 PM PDT by Smellin Salt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome; All

Yup, and some continue with the face mask fad.


10 posted on 07/01/2021 7:15:49 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn’t common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Wait .. masks are causing elevated CO2 levels????

And increasing CO2 levels means an increase in global temperatures, right?

Therefore, mask wearing children are causing climate change and we’re all gonna die!!!

11 posted on 07/01/2021 7:28:19 PM PDT by GBA (Endeavor to persevere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

That’s why you cut slots in your masks, duh.
Only a fool would wear a “functioning” mask.


12 posted on 07/01/2021 7:36:04 PM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

And No Mask and Jab Promoting FRoctors in sight...


13 posted on 07/01/2021 7:59:41 PM PDT by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see #KAG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Mask wearing = CHILD ABUSE
14 posted on 07/01/2021 9:06:30 PM PDT by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
DUH....how else do you suppose so many allegedly voted for Buy-DUNG ?
15 posted on 07/01/2021 9:08:44 PM PDT by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Here in the suburbs of Dallas, few people have worn masks for a couple of months now. It’s mainly workers who don’t have a choice who wear them. Since my work lifted the requirement, I haven’t even thought of wearing one anywhere.


16 posted on 07/01/2021 9:36:27 PM PDT by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rastus; bitt

Same here; not that many masked up, and those that are are either medics or store salespeople.


17 posted on 07/01/2021 10:17:04 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bitt

We’re in an age so stupid it requires a scientific study to prove it’s a bad idea to impair the ability to breathe.


18 posted on 07/01/2021 10:39:32 PM PDT by Flick Lives (“Today we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Related thread: Lying and misleading headlines: "Researchers find face masks don't hinder breathing during exercise:" Science past and present - and common sense (study)
19 posted on 07/02/2021 6:56:55 AM PDT by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save + be baptized + follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson