Posted on 06/21/2021 2:19:33 AM PDT by ReaganGeneration2
After fifteen months of assiduous reading, study, observation, and research, I have come to some conclusions about what is called COVID-19.
I would like to emphasize that I have done this work obsessively since it seemed so important.
I have consulted information and arguments across all media, corporate and alternative, academic, medical, books, etc. I have consulted with researchers around the world. I have read the websites of the CDC, the World Health Organization, and government and non-government health organizations.
In other words, I have left no stone unturned, despite the overt or covert political leanings of the sources. I have done this as a sociologist and writer, not as a medical doctor, although many of my sources have been medical doctors and medical studies.
My succinct conclusions follow without links to sources since I am not trying to persuade anyone of anything but just stating for the public record what I have concluded.
Life is short. I am going to say it now…
I know that vast numbers of people have been hypnotized by fear, threats, and bribes to accept the corporate mainstream media’s version of COVID-19. I have concluded that many millions are moving in a trance state and do not know this. They have been induced into this state by a well-organized, very sophisticated propaganda campaign that has drawn on the human fear of death and disease.
Those behind this have no doubt studied the high incidence of hypochondriasis in the general population and the fear of an invisible “virus” in societies where belief in God and the spiritual invisible has been replaced by faith in science. Knowing their audience well, they have concocted a campaign of fear and confusion to induce obedience...
(Excerpt) Read more at off-guardian.org ...
The guy has a point, besides the one on the top of his head.
PIng
thanks for your work, ‘note.
OK so is this useless clickbait or worth checking out? Never heard of off-guardian...and way too much blog pimping going on these days.
Greatly overestimated. The database is full empty entries, e.g. cause of death is listed as "death". Deaths reported 60 days after vaccination with no cause of death given.
Not clickbait at all. Just the usual innuendo and speculation. For example, the guy doesn't know the difference between adenovirus-based gene therapy (J&J, A-Z) and mRNA. In fact he knows nothing. (He has know in italics throughout his piece).
.
Just the usual innuendo and speculation.
***
Ok got it, don’t waste my time.
Thanks.
Post a link to any research Institute that claims to have isolated this bug?
Been looking for a year now....want a genome....
It’s worth a read.
One needn’t go further than questioning whether the virus exists. He is either mentally disturbed or a warped attention seeker.
About – Edward Curtinhttp://edwardcurtin.com › about
Educated in the classics, philosophy, literature, theology, and sociology, I teach sociology at Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts
Enough said
...want a genome....
____________________
They have one, concocted from some fragments and then filled in by a computer program with access to a coronavirus database.
What they have not produced is an isolate from an infected individual that was cultured and then identified using dark field microscopy, resulting in a photo of the alleged virus. So they were not then able to purify that non-existent culture, introduce it into a test subject and reproduce the so-called disease state.
But genome? The Chinese gave them one early on.
We have to take everyone’s word for the origin, accuracy and method of discovery of that genome, but it is available.
If they ever perform the elementary process to extract, culture, purify and show evidence of infectiousness, along with tangible evidence in the form of observable microphotographs, then someone can run the genome of that verified sample and compare it to the one provided.
Can’t they just put a mask on someone in the hospital for Covid and then take that mask and find the virus? Or have someone with Covid breath into a bottle, I mean, since it’s spread by the breath, hence having everyone wear masks, I don’t understand why this wasn’t done a year ago.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3969663/posts?page=1
covid tests recalled after giving false positives..
You’re in luck! The genome of SARS CoV2 is likely one of the most studied ever and has been sequenced hundreds of thousands of times. You can find 664,124 sequencing runs here.
If you want just one, here you go:
Complete Genome Sequence of a 2019 Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Strain Isolated in Nepal
Do you agree now that the virus genome has indeed been fully sequenced?
“But genome? The Chinese gave them one early on.
We have to take everyone’s word for the origin, accuracy and method of discovery of that genome, but it is available.
If they ever perform the elementary process to extract, culture, purify and show evidence of infectiousness, along with tangible evidence in the form of observable microphotographs, then someone can run the genome of that verified sample and compare it to the one provided.”
That goes to the crux of the problem.
From a previous post.
“On January 10 2020 a consortium led by Yong-Zhen Zhang of the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center & School of Public Health posted the genome sequence on an open-access site, virological.org.
Mrna technology was already existent and Moderna began work almost immediately. Once the Genome had been supplied it was relatively easy to fabricate a vaccine so long as you weren’t to careful to look closely at it ie: Warp Speed
This was same folks (China) who were still lying regarding the source of Covid namely the “wet market. Their data was accepted virtually without question. I can find no where Kochs’ postulate or Bradford Hill criteria were used to prove that what the Chinese supplied was correct.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch%27s_postulates
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradford_Hill_criteria“
All vaccines flowed from what China supplied and we just sat back and took it as gospel.
Inquiring minds would love to know.
As I understand it, there is a time-honored protocol for proof known as Koch’s Postulates. However, this is now old-fashioned & out-of-date, especially for viruses. Sort of like the modern understanding that immunity is only granted thru innoculation.
Koch’s postulates
Four criteria showing a causal relationship between a causative microbe and a disease
Koch’s postulates
Koch’s postulates are four criteria designed to establish a causative relationship between a microbe and a disease. The postulates were formulated by Robert Koch and Friedrich Loeffler in 1884, based on earlier concepts described by Jakob Henle, and refined and published by Koch in 1890. Koch applied the postulates to describe the etiology of cholera and tuberculosis, both of which are now ascribed to bacteria. The postulates have been controversially generalized to other diseases. More modern concepts in microbial pathogenesis cannot be examined using Koch’s postulates, including viruses and asymptomatic carriers. They have largely been supplanted by other criteria such as the Bradford Hill criteria for infectious disease causality in modern public health, and Falkow’s criteria for microbial pathogenesis.
Wikipedia
________
Bradford Hill criteria
The Bradford Hill criteria, otherwise known as Hill’s criteria for causation, are a group of nine principles that can be useful in establishing epidemiologic evidence of a causal relationship between a presumed cause and an observed effect and have been widely used in public health research. They were established in 1965 by the English epidemiologist Sir Austin Bradford Hill.
Wikipedia
Molecular Koch’s postulates
Molecular Koch’s postulates are a set of experimental criteria that must be satisfied to show that a gene found in a pathogenic microorganism encodes a product that contributes to the disease caused by the pathogen. Genes that satisfy molecular Koch’s postulates are often referred to as virulence factors. The postulates were formulated by the microbiologist Stanley Falkow in 1988 and are based on Koch’s postulates.
Wikipedia
________________________
The information that you bring to these threads is much appreciated!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.