So, the law remains in the books but is toothless? I guess the commies in Congress will now look to put penalties back for not complying to the mandate.
To: NohSpinZone
Once again the excuse is “standing.” Just another word for avoiding tough decisions.
2 posted on
06/17/2021 7:23:38 AM PDT by
Avalon Memories
(Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right...)
To: NohSpinZone
The states should just refuse to pay.
3 posted on
06/17/2021 7:39:43 AM PDT by
McGavin999
(biden is not my president )
To: NohSpinZone
Roberts off to Malta with only a briefcase?
4 posted on
06/17/2021 7:56:21 AM PDT by
Dr. Ursus
To: NohSpinZone
its weird how this law helps no one in a realistic manner.
they would have been better off to make medicare available to any who wanted it, except that those under retirement age need to pay for their current coverages much like they would for private insurance. The advantage to this is that the customer pool would be so large that they could provide drastically lower rates.
Point here is that although i am not in favor of the government running just about anything, doing it the medicare-way i list above would eff people less than the current system which charges people huge premiums and huge deductibles and comes out to the individuals advantage if they have a catastrophic health event or issue.
6 posted on
06/17/2021 8:00:14 AM PDT by
NicoDon
To: NohSpinZone
“the red states and two individuals who brought the dispute do not have the legal standing to challenge the constitutionality of the law’s individual mandate”
Individuals have no standing to challenge an “individual mandate”??? States don’t either?
So who exactly would have standing? Does the federal government have to challenge itself?
7 posted on
06/17/2021 8:19:42 AM PDT by
Boogieman
To: P-Marlowe
How do states not have standing in an issue involving states?
13 posted on
06/17/2021 11:35:30 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory. )
To: NohSpinZone
Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney “The Saint” Barrett sided with the libs.
I am shocked!
16 posted on
06/17/2021 11:41:23 AM PDT by
ronniesgal
(so I wonder what his FR handle is???? )
To: Impy
Red States should take it upon themselves, and nullify Obama care as they’re right to do so if States can nullify federal weed laws and prostitution laws they can nullify this too.
To: NohSpinZone
If Clarence Thomas agreed with this decision, perhaps it is legally correct.
22 posted on
06/17/2021 1:31:27 PM PDT by
devere
To: NohSpinZone; Travis McGee
from way back
23 posted on
06/17/2021 2:04:46 PM PDT by
SaveFerris
(The Lord and Messiah: Jesus Christ of Nazareth - http://www.BiblicalJesusChrist.Com)
To: NohSpinZone
and two individuals who brought the dispute do not have the legal standing to challenge the constitutionality of the law's individual mandate to buy health insurance.
so just exactly WHO does have standing???
28 posted on
06/17/2021 2:29:18 PM PDT by
Chode
(there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. P144:1)
To: NohSpinZone
So much for a conservative Supreme Court. None of them can be trusted to DO WHAT IS RIGHT according to the US Constitution. None of them.
30 posted on
06/17/2021 5:55:03 PM PDT by
RetiredArmy
(Free Will. GOD gives you the choice I accept or reject Him! Choose Him. It depends on you.)
To: NohSpinZone
Supreme Court rejects GOP challenge to Obamacare, upholding health care law Communists.
53 posted on
06/28/2021 8:20:12 PM PDT by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson