[TexasGurl24]

They are very relevant. Look at the question that was asked.

I understand that you aren’t a lawyer, but you should be able to read.

[precisionshootist]

" They are very relevant. Look at the question that was asked. I understand that you aren’t a lawyer, but you should be able to read. "

I'm not a lawyer, but being a lawyer does not mean you understand the law on any level. One can easily graduate law school today and totally suck at litigating. You forget half the time lawyers like yourself LOSE your arguments. I think you need to brush up on reading skills because if you cited those cases in support of actual litigation on invasive electronic searches you would end up looking like a fool.

[precisionshootist]

And by the way. I'm not convinced you are a lawyer either. Are you?

Have you litigated any test cases?

What is your record litigating civil cases in the area?