[precisionshootist]

" They are very relevant. Look at the question that was asked. I understand that you aren’t a lawyer, but you should be able to read. "

I'm not a lawyer, but being a lawyer does not mean you understand the law on any level. One can easily graduate law school today and totally suck at litigating. You forget half the time lawyers like yourself LOSE your arguments. I think you need to brush up on reading skills because if you cited those cases in support of actual litigation on invasive electronic searches you would end up looking like a fool.

[TexasGurl24]

You are playing the game that lay people typically play when they can’t cite to any authority for their position other than what they wish the law would be.

I noticed that you completely dodged what I posted to you. (That’s not arguing by the way.)

So again, please cite a specific case in support of your novel position. Just one.

I’ll be waiting.