Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/09/2021 5:26:54 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Is there any democrat, anywhere, who didn’t need fraud to win?


2 posted on 06/09/2021 5:34:20 AM PDT by Mark17 (Father of US Air Force combat pilot )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Pretty interesting statistical analysis.

It appears both candidates cheated, according to Benford's law, Just the Gascon machine was better at cheating with the mail-in votes!

3 posted on 06/09/2021 5:37:48 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

perhaps irrefutable, Babalouie? It’s either irrefutable, or it’s refutable. Sort of like a little bit pregnant.


5 posted on 06/09/2021 6:34:00 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
If there was election fraud, then it was likely done in a way that would not be detected by Benford's law.

For example when Democrat poll workers in Fulton County pulled out extra boxes of ballots after the observers were sent home and re-ran them through the machines, they were producing just as "natural" a number in the Benford's law sense, as when many honest citizens cast one legal authorized vote each.

Similarly with vote harvesting, people mailing in fake ballots for dead people, etc, as far as Benford's law is concerned it is natural.

What Benford's law catches is little changes in the books by single digits. Like when a number starting with a 1 is changed to start with a 4 too many times.

A false positive for fraud detection will often show up in Benford's law looking at voting precincts or roughly uniform size. For example if precincts happen to have about 1,0000, then the number of votes in a two candidate race will typically start with 4, 5, or 6 more than 1 or 2. The fact that the votes are distributed across roughly equal princincts of a certain size relative to where breaks in numbers are in base 10 makes the numbers not "natural" in the Benford's law sense.

It seems unlikely the methods the Democrats have been using to cheat are the kind of changing of the first digit in natural numbers that Benford's law could detect, so I think it is a waste of time and waste of credibility to promote Benford's in our case for vote fraud.

6 posted on 06/09/2021 6:34:37 AM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

He is a fraud.


8 posted on 06/09/2021 6:56:45 AM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Kalifornia is the epitome of election rigging and vote fraud and has been for decades. How do you think the communist democrat in control of Kalifornia have become so intrenched. Guaranteed it wasn’t be voter choice.


9 posted on 06/09/2021 7:26:28 AM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The dims have been cheating for decades…they have just scaled it up to epic levels…


10 posted on 06/09/2021 8:25:13 AM PDT by Hogblog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Was George Gascón Elected by Fraud?

I have always suspected it.

Lacey is amazing. Gascon appears to be evil.


11 posted on 06/09/2021 8:20:29 PM PDT by PrayAndVoteConservesInLibsOut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson