Maybe our side finally got up to speed on the backmail stuff... lol
Yes.
More likely that the “conservative” justices traded the election stand down for a decision to be named later.
What distinguishes this case from the dozens of others where the liberal justices had no problem making up preposterous interpretations of statutes and nonexistent constitutional “rights”? Perhaps the liberal justices are actually disturbed by developments at the border? Maybe it’s something else but I can’t think of anything.