Chinese military scientist 'filed a patent for a COVID-19 vaccine BEFORE the virus was declared a global pandemic and worked closely with 'bat woman' at Wuhan institute'

UK Daily Mail ^ | June 07 2021 | ANDREW COURT

[knighthawk]

A Chinese military scientist with ties to the United States reportedly filed a patent for a COVID-19 vaccine well before the disease was declared a global pandemic.

Yusen Zhou, who worked for the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), lodged the paperwork on behalf of the Chinese political party on February 24 2020, according to The Australian newspaper.

That date was just five weeks after China first confirmed human transmission of the coronavirus.

[Pajamajan]

bttt

[2aProtectsTheRest]

Feb 24, 2020? They were late to the party.

Moderna began manufacturing their first batch of vaccine for their Phase 1 clinical trials on January 13th; over a month prior. First batch of vaccine was completed February 7th and shipped to NIH for the Phase 1 clinical study February 24th.

So they were over a month behind the US and came up with a product that stinks (50% efficacy vs Moderna’s 94.1%)? Hah, typical China.

[Libloather]

A Chinese military scientist with ties to the United States...

Fauci?

[petitfour]

It’s like Moderna had a head start.

[Fitzy_888]

You can’t patent a natural occurring virus or compound.

Nothing to see here, move all.

[tired&retired]

Per the article:

Scientist Yusen Zhou reportedly filed a patent for a COVID-19 vaccine on behalf of China’s People’s Liberation Army on February 24 2020

China had only declared human transmission of the virus five weeks prior

News that Zhou filed a patent for a vaccine so quickly suggests Chinese officials may have known about the virus much earlier than they admitted

Zhou is also said to have worked closely with the deputy director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology

Some scientists have theorized that the virus was created inside that lab before it inadvertently leaked out

Zhou died in mysterious circumstances in May 2020 - less than three months after filing the patent

[cpdiii]

“Zhou died in mysterious circumstances in May 2020 - less than three months after filing the patent”

Sudden onset acute lead toxicity?

[Fitzy_888]

(Yusen Zhou contribution)

Adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 in BALB/c mice for testing vaccine efficacy

Gu, H., Chen, Q., Yang, G., He, L., Fan, H., Deng, Y. Q., Wang, Y., Teng, Y., Zhao, Z., Cui, Y., Li, Y., Li, X. F., Li, J., Zhang, N. N., Yang, X., Chen, S., Guo, Y., Zhao, G., Wang, X., Luo, D. Y. & 12 others, , 25 Sep 2020, In: Science. 369, 6511

A Mouse Model of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Pathogenesis

Sun, S. H., Chen, Q., Gu, H. J., Yang, G., Wang, Y. X., Huang, X. Y., Liu, S. S., Zhang, N. N., Li, X. F., Xiong, R., Guo, Y., Deng, Y. Q., Huang, W. J., Liu, Q., Liu, Q. M., Shen, Y. L., Zhou, Y., Yang, X., Zhao, T. Y., Fan, C. F. & 3 others, , 8 Jul 2020, In: Cell Host and Microbe. 28, 1

Characterization of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of 2019 novel coronavirus: implication for development of RBD protein as a viral attachment inhibitor and vaccine

Tai, W., He, L., Zhang, X., Pu, J., Voronin, D., Jiang, S., Zhou, Y. & Du, L., 1 Jun 2020, In: Cellular and Molecular Immunology. 17, 6

Molecular mechanism for antibody-dependent enhancement of coronavirus entry

Wan, Y., Shang, J., Sun, S., Tai, W., Chen, J., Geng, Q., He, L., Chen, Y., Wu, J., Shi, Z., Zhou, Y., Du, L. & Li, F., 1 Mar 2020, In: Journal of Virology. 94, 5

Advances in MERS-CoV vaccines and therapeutics based on the receptor-binding domain

Zhou, Y., Yang, Y., Huang, J., Jiang, S. & Du, L., 1 Jan 2019, In: Viruses. 11, 1

(Many more at link.)

LINK: https://covid19.elsevierpure.com/en/persons/yu-sen-zhou/publications/

[Fitzy_888]

(He’s China’s Dr Fauci...)

Prospects for a MERS-CoV spike vaccine

Zhou, Y., Jiang, S. & Du, L., 3 Aug 2018, In: Expert Review of Vaccines. 17, 8

[myerson]

Color me suspicious. It is SOP for criminals in government to first create a problem in order to then create a solution, all for profit of some sort—financial or political. Why is this Covid hustle any different? Who is benefitting from the spread of Covid and vaccines? Why are therapeutics such as hydroxychoriquin and ivermectin not only ignored as treatments but actually demonized?

[tired&retired]

No wonder one of their leaders decided to defect.

[2aProtectsTheRest]

No, the mRNA platform allows for rapid development because you literally just need to plug in the nucleotide sequences necessary for the antigen and out pops the product. Nothing needs to be grown. Nothing needs to be purified. Nothing needs to be extracted. Nothing needs to be attenuated.

All those old long, difficult, complex processes are gone. The new third generation platform is so fast, no pathogen is going to be able to keep up. Annual flu shots are going to go from 40-60% effective to 95% effective. And we’ll almost certainly see massive leaps in cancer, HIV, and other challenges too.

[Yardstick]

Question from the peanut gallery. How did they make the leap from killing 100% of animals during developmental testing to producing vaccines that are (generally considered) safe? There must have been some change or innovation in the mRNA technology that made this possible. That is, the developers must have solved some key problem that had been stymying them. Do you happen to know what that problem was and how they solved it?

[petitfour]

Have they used it in flu vaccines successfully? Or any vaccines?

[2aProtectsTheRest]

"How did they make the leap from killing 100% of animals during developmental testing"

I've heard this myth so many times, but every time I ask for a link to the study where an mRNA vaccine killed all the animals in animal trials, I get crickets for a response. So I'll ask again: do you have a link to a study where an mRNA vaccine was being tested and all the animals died?

The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were successfully tested with mice and rhesus macaques. All the animals lived. All of them showed the anticipated immune response. All of them survived the challenge trials. There was no problem that needed to be solved relating to animals dying. The only problems with mRNA vaccines were that they A) were too expensive and complex to make at scale until the technology matured and B) how to deliver the mRNA to cellular cytoplasm before the nonspecific immune system destroyed the mRNA itself. Both of those challenges were solved.

[2aProtectsTheRest]

"Have they used it in flu vaccines successfully? Or any vaccines?"

It's been used successfully in two COVID-19 vaccines. Both show ~95% efficacy. Both are safe. Both are helping rid the western world of COVID-19 even as countries that bought the Chinese garbage whole virus vaccine see their cases and deaths surge because it doesn't work.

Israel vaccinated their whole population with the Pfizer vaccine. Israel had 5 new cases and 0 deaths yesterday. 2 days ago they had 27 new cases and 1 death. In a country of over 9 million. All their COVID-19 restrictions are being lifted. They're open for business. COVID-19 is over there. All their neighbors are seeing COVID-19 cases and deaths remain steady or rise, but not Israel. They're vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine which has wiped out the pandemic there.

[Yardstick]

Thanks for the reply and, no, I don’t have a link. I’ve seen it claimed so many times that I assumed it was likely to be true. Actually it’s not just that I had seen it claimed but that I hadn’t seen it disputed. This is the first time, so this is good to know.

[2aProtectsTheRest]

There are a lot of crazy, nonsense claims that get thrown out there by people with an agenda against vaccines. Mostly it seems they just pick up talking points from a Facebook post they never bothered to even do a simple Google search on and throw a bunch of stuff at the wall to see what sticks.

Claims range from the almost believable to the absolutely laughable (e.g. the vaccines have mind control microchips in them, they’ll turn you into a zombie, they have space alien DNA in them, etc.). The laughably stupid claims aren’t really a big deal because the only people who buy into that sort of nonsense choose to live in fantasy. The more believable claims (e.g. they can alter your DNA, they’re placebo that don’t do anything, etc.) are more insidious because rational people who don’t have a strong background in the subject can be duped by them.

Definitely ask questions when someone’s making extraordinary claims, and ask for links to authoritative reference sources. If they give you Alex Jones conspiracy websites with chemtrails and space aliens and CIA mind control machines, that info is probably garbage. If they give you an actual scientific journal link such as Nature of The Lancet, make sure you read at least the abstract and the results sections. Sometimes claims get made by taking a small snipet of info from a study out of context and giving it a whole new - make-believe - context so it fits someone’s personal agenda.

[2aProtectsTheRest]

That should read “Nature OR The Lancet”.

Nature of The Lancet sounds like some kind of bad nerd fiction.