why? and on what grounds?or if they ask for a complete facebook history, and that of all friends, no problem
They probably already have info from all the other news orgs that published the story or they would have objected as well
How does reading USA Today imply that you’re involved in child porn?
The FBI smells bad.
PING!
What am I missing here?
Why would they want the readers of a news story?
What could they possibly do with that information?
Two FBI agents got killed in February here in FL and it didn’t make much of a splash in the news?
That is pretty strange.
FBI = FIB
I wish there was a rule of style for the god damned hyphenated numbers. You don’t need the hyphens. He was a 55 year old man not a 55-year-old man. A three year old child is sometimes called a three-year-old. Three and a half hours does not need to get all hyphenated either. Out of control doesn’t get hyphenated.
These agents live in a bubble. They hate regular citizens. Those on the left and the right should be able to see that they’re domestic terrorists along with the other 3 letter criminal agencies like DEA.
I can’t see why anyone would want to help them. It’s not just the leadership. Every agent is indoctrinated into a Gestapo like cult
Look up Milgrim experiment and you can see how regular people are willing to administer a death shock on command.
Two fewer FIB agents and I could care less.
why? and on what grounds?what happened to the 4th amendment warrant requirement?
USA Today is a porn site? I didn’t know that.
I believe I read that original article. All the pictures are very similar.
I cannot say I would cheer for either side of this incident.
If fact for me, the best case scenario is everyone on both sides ends up dead.
FBI are government criminal thugs. Dont make an argument some are good, none are doing what needs to be done to fix the place. It basically requires atual arests and perp walks of all the corrupt agents and admin folks they know of, right now,no waiting.
Until that hapens and we have thousands of arrests by agents who want that place to actually have a good reputation again, dont talk to me about good fbi people.
Happened down in south Florida. The local media, always anxious to exploit mayhem if it’ll hurt a conservative or Republican, has NO CURIOUSITY about this case. Made the news for a day or two, then dropped off the radar.
Tells me something is being hidden.
I bet USA Today did cooperate for those at the peaceful protest on Jan 6 and only targeted conservatives.
3.5 hours after the raid and murder of two agents, USA Today publishes a story about it. I don’t think they are trying to catch child porn fiends or someone who tipped off the killer. The FBI demand makes sense (only?) if details in the story had to have been leaked by an insider — either FBI or other first responder.
Perhaps the FBI has a list of all those who could know these details, and have interviewed them. In that process, perhaps all denied reading the USA Today story. So the FBI seeks to find a match from their suspect list among those who read the story. Any match who had denied reading the story would be in a “lying to the FBI” trap. The FBI would use that to arrest and hammer the leaker into a plea, and force them to divulge what else they might have been leaking. Just a theory...
If the story were about the January 6 event, USA today would have asked the FBI agent, how else can we help you sir?
This is why I still get a paper newspaper. No accounts, no logging.
Color me cynical. If they wanted IPs on a story Trump supporters were reading they’d get instant cooperation.
I finally thought of a scenario where this makes sense.
If someone posted on a child-porn site that this guy was killed during a porn bust, and said he read it on USA Today then they are trying to identify him.
p