Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Social Justice' Means Treating Some People Unjustly
American Thinker.com ^ | June 3, 2021 | Warren Beatty

Posted on 06/03/2021 3:45:36 AM PDT by Kaslin

The definition of 'social justice' is imprecise. That's where the rub begins. It has precise meaning only for its user, is what the user wants it to be. So, can it be precisely defined? Perhaps, if we focus upon its application.

In his 1999 book The Quest for Cosmic Justice, Dr. Thomas Sowell wrote, "In politics, the great non-sequitur of our time is that 1) things are not right and that 2) the government should make them right. Where right all too often means cosmic justice, trying to set things right means writing a blank check for a never-ending expansion of government power."

That explains the ultimate objective of social justice: a never-ending expansion of government power [emphasis mine].

Sowell defines social justice (which he labels 'cosmic justice,' the relief of all misfortune) as an effort which seeks to eliminate undeserved disadvantages for selected groups. He defines 'undeserved disadvantages' by referencing Dr. Thomas Nagle's definition: 'unequal starting points' certain people have through no fault of their own.

What governmental policies (which Sowell universally rejects) can be enacted to reduce or eliminate unequal starting points? To answer that, Sowell references John Rawls, who insisted 'having everyone play by the same rules or be judged by the same standards' was not sufficient. True equality of opportunity meant 'adjusting starting points to provide everyone with equal prospects of success from equal individual efforts,' and 'putting [selected] segments of society in the position that they would have been in but for some undeserved misfortune' [more about additional society obligation below].

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/03/2021 3:45:36 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

THE Warren Beatty?


2 posted on 06/03/2021 3:49:10 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The correct term is “SOCIALIST Justice” which is an oxymoron.


3 posted on 06/03/2021 3:50:44 AM PDT by newfreep (“Leftism, under all of its brand names, is a severe, violent & evil mental disorder.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,.....”


4 posted on 06/03/2021 3:54:45 AM PDT by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don't understand, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Just call it “ The Big Get-Even”. Still, anything will never be enough for the ugly angry delusional bastards


5 posted on 06/03/2021 4:00:58 AM PDT by griswold3 (NBA/ Plumlee Ball. = poor entertainment value while insulting the audience gets you broke )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Social Justice is racism, simple as that. Period.


6 posted on 06/03/2021 4:09:27 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

bkmk


7 posted on 06/03/2021 4:15:14 AM PDT by sauropod (Chance favors the prepared mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cranked

Social Justice can be summed in 2 words: GET WHITEY!!


8 posted on 06/03/2021 4:16:48 AM PDT by MachIV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This post by Captain Obvious?


9 posted on 06/03/2021 4:19:20 AM PDT by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

‘Social Justice’ Means Treating Some People Unjustly Which Solves Racial Injustice By Stigmatizing Government Selected Different Groups or CRT on Action.


10 posted on 06/03/2021 4:25:22 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

11 posted on 06/03/2021 4:29:47 AM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren’t only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else. All this equality was due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, and to the unceasing vigilance of agents of the United States Handicapper General. — Kurt Vonnegut


12 posted on 06/03/2021 6:46:06 PM PDT by Captain Compassion (I'm just sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson