Posted on 06/02/2021 7:50:19 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
After 35 years, the Chinese Communist Party loosened the notorious one-child policy in 2015. On Monday, China weakened the notorious and barbaric one-child policy even further, but Western social scientist Steven Mosher (who studied the policy in China when it began in 1980) warned that President Xi Jinping is likely to launch a similarly barbaric policy in the opposite direction.
“To actively respond to the aging of the population … a couple is permitted to have three children,” China’s state media outlet Xinhua reported on Monday. Xi and the Communist Party’s politburo made the decision recently.
While the one-child policy, which dates back to 1980, resulted in millions of forced abortions and sterilizations and led Western countries like the U.S. to take in unwanted Chinese baby girls (like my two adopted cousins), Xi’s new policy may be similarly barbaric.
Steven Mosher, president of the Population Research Institute (PRI), explained the dangers of this new policy.
“Today, thanks to the Chinese Communist Party misbegotten population control policies, China is literally dying, filling more coffins than cradles each year,” Mosher noted. “Desperate for more workers and soldiers, the Party leader Xi is now pushing people to have more, not fewer children.”
“If the Chinese people do not ‘voluntarily’ have more children, the Party will begin an escalating series of bribes, threats and punishments to ensure that they do,” Mosher warned. “Forced pregnancy is coming to China sooner than we think.”
Yes, the Chinese Communist Party seems primed to switch from decades of forced abortion and sterilization to a brutal policy of forced pregnancy, in order to build up the fighting force that Xi wants to impose his will on China and its neighbors.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
We could send them our feminazis to turn into forced baby factories in exchange for their dissidents.
Great. With the Chinese preference for male children the 21 million surplus males will become 50 million surplus males in about 10 years. That is a lot of cannon fodder they can afford to lose in a world war.
OK. Wonder if anyone wishes to predict the year that China makes an overt military move to seize Russia’r rich underpopulated Pacific regions and the Siberian treasure house. It will happen IMHO in 2029. The Chinese did make that huge investment in its military for nothing.
They have built entire cities from the ground up - and they are empty. They have to fill them up.
Let's talk again in a century or two. They have 1.4 billion people. Its people, culture and nation have existed in various forms for 5000 years. One thing China, Korea and Japan WON'T do in this low-birth period is import foreign/alien peoples to replace its native population. They will be around long after the globalists have destroyed the USA.
Old saying the progressives don’t like hearing;
“Sparta needs sons.”
Even the strongest governments that have ZERO opposition screw up managing things.
This is the wisdom of our Founding Fathers.....keep government small because it does not do many things well, regardless of good intentions.
Unfortunately, this is a lesson that is mostly forgotten in today’s communist mentality of the west. Most people would prefer power consolidated among a handful so they can “get things done”. These people have no idea the horrors and misery that will follow.
The Chi-Coms are gearing up for the possibility of a long war with the west by replenishing their population.
Allendale-what will Russia do about it? It’s their problem. Very underpopulated.
Plan to spread Chinese people and domination around he world after wiping out population with covid.
Only for the Chinese. Not the Uighur’s - who are to be sterilized.
Tom Clancy wrote a novel, "The Bear and the Dragon" about that very real probability.
As Clancy repeatedly says, "war is just a mugging, writ large".
BTW, this novel {1028 pages} was written in 2000 and is my Clancy favorite.
After this one, the ghost writers took over, and the Clancy quality and magic went overboard.
Yup. They play the long game and diversity is not their strength. They and the japs et all never gave into the folly like we have. Ditto for places like Norway.
In the long game they win since we don’t have one. Our tax policy for example seldom lasts more than 3-5 years without some sweeping change.
I’m not gonna accept that even forced pregnancies is anywhere near as bad as abortions, voluntary or involuntary.
There are tons of Chinese women. The problem is, is that they prefer Western men. That’s the real reason why China prefers males.
Millions of families in China have more than one child. Simply payoff the local CCP boss. I know a bunch of them.
China is about to learn a demographic truism. While governments can intrusively lower their people’s birth rates, they are generally unable to raise them. This is because people adapt to the lower birth rate and prefer it.
“...to a brutal policy of forced pregnancy”
Say what one might about the above, but the present path of the West and free Asia (societal suicide, but not having kids) isn’t any better.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.