Critical Race Theory Versus American Exceptionalism

Over the past few weeks, legislatures, school boards, and parents have risen to challenge critical race theory (CRT) as a divisive ideology that teaches our children to become racists.

Their objections have brought this once-obscure academic theory to the front pages of newspapers around the country.

They’ve also raised some burning questions: What is CRT? What makes it so objectionable? How can this central pillar of “antiracist” training be racist?

The answer begins, as so many do these days, with the progressive penchant for the redefining—or rather, deconstruction—of words. “Antiracist” training is racist because progressives have redefined “racism.”

CRT scholars have been clear and consistent on this matter. The “antiracism” they’re preaching isn’t the “anti-racism” of Martin Luther King Jr. Nor is it opposition to the discriminatory treatment most Americans oppose when speaking against racism. CRT contends that the “systems” defining modern American life are irredeemably racist. It calls for a revolutionary upheaval, laying waste to every existing governmental, legal, economic, cultural, social, communal, and familial institution.

CRT’s “antiracism” explicitly requires compensatory discrimination against “white people,” rather than equal treatment for all. To further this goal, K–12 CRT programs emphasize and heighten racial identity, segregate students by racial group, discriminate in their treatment of these groups, and teach that racial tension is unavoidable.

CRT also embodies an absolute and total rejection of American exceptionalism. One consequence of that rejection is that CRT has become a shorthand for the entire constellation of anti-American neo-Marxist theories dominating today’s political left. Whereas Marx cast history as a struggle among economic classes, contemporary Marxists believe that struggles among races and genders to be at least as important. CRT sees the entire American experiment of extolling individual liberty as white supremacism seen through the lens of good public relations.

Though CRT’s blurring of culture clashes may give its advocates a talking point, it’s hardly one of consequence. Just as Marx missed the incredible adaptivity of capitalism and the benefits it confers upon poor workers, CRT’s loathing of America blinds it to the adaptive and evolutionary role American exceptionalism has played in combating discrimination.

There was nothing exceptional about the first African slave ships to arrive in the New World in the early 17th century. Slavery had been around throughout recorded history. Every known culture, everywhere in the world, had embraced inequality. Captives taken from conquered cities, warring tribes, or disfavored faiths had long been sold into bondage. People were born into a station in life and expected to behave accordingly. Few even bothered to question such “structural inequalities.” No human society had ever embraced the radical idea that “all men are created equal,” much less tried to put it into practice.

That is, until July 4, 1776, when a slaveholding plantation owner named Thomas Jefferson declared it to be the foundational creed of a new nation. That foundation was truly exceptional. It sent the young America on a collision course with all of past history. One after another, the time-honored institutions of inequality fell before this revolutionary American ethos.

Four score and seven years later, Abraham Lincoln reiterated Jefferson’s proposition as part of the fight to end slavery. A century after that, King galvanized the nation to end Jim Crow. Over the next few decades, the United States not only dismantled all legal and most social barriers to black advancement, but also adopted numerous set asides and preferences to promote the full integration of its black citizens into the American dream. In 2009, America inaugurated its first black president.

Those steps were all exceptional and proper sources of American pride. Yet viewed through the lens of CRT, they merely masked increasingly subtle forms of anti-black racism and white supremacism.

CRT’s ability to reach such a conclusion reveals just what type of “theory” it is. CRT relies upon the reasoning that has served as the hallmark of conspiracy-theoretic thinking: Evidence—like slavery—tending to support the argument that the United States is racist is taken at face value, while evidence tending to negate it—like the elevation of King to the forefront of this country’s heroes—is inverted into support. To critical race theorists, CRT is self-evidently true. All relevant evidence, no matter what it appears to say, is taken as confirmation.

CRT is a toxic, racist, anti-American conspiracy theory. At its heart is a denial of the American exceptionalism that has done more than any other ideology to combat inequality and discrimination. CRT has no place in our schools. America’s children should learn that their nation introduced new notions of equality to the world—and dedicated its history to broadening their applicability. They should learn to embrace America’s foundational ideal and take pride in the way it has developed throughout our history.

True advocates for diversity and inclusion should love no country on earth more than the United States. Our exceptional nation has taught the world that broad equality under the law provides a far better path to stability and prosperity than the perpetual struggle among divided groups ever could. That’s why true opponents of racism oppose CRT—in our schools and elsewhere.

This article gets it very incorrect by skipping the revolutionary era and jumping directly to the Declaration of Independence.

We need to name the bad guys specifically. Yes, in once instance(French controlled areas in general, New Orleans in particular) France brought the slaves here and France ran those slave plantations. Yes, in another instance(Spanish controlled areas in general, Florida as one particular) Spain brought the slaves here and Spain ran those slave plantations. (Others, etc, Netherlands for example)

However, in general, slavery in North America is preeminently the fault of the British Empire. They brought slavery here. They ran those plantations. In the 1770s, as the Patriots were developing their identity one of the features that it contained was abolitionism and laws to the effect of slavery-abolition successfully made it to the desks of British-controlled governor's desks in multiple colonies.

The Empire (The King, Parliament{and/or}) it's gubernatorial creatures vetoed those abolitionist laws, preventing them from going into effect.

The more I learn about about these abolitionism vetoes, the more it irks me to see these dismissive statements of "oh Slavery had been around throughout...." BS! No it hasn't and wasn't just "been around", stop saying that! When the patriots decided consciously to abolish slavery, when the patriots consciously decided to write the laws and put them on the governor's desks, and when the KING CONSCIOUSLY DECIDED TO VETO THE LAWS AND PREVENT THEM FROM BECOMING COLONIAL LAW that singular moment everything changed.

Yes, in that moment and from then on it is factual to say that the British Empire forced slavery on America. It wasn't just this inert thing flying around in the air like a mosquito. Oh look another butterfly how quaint. BS! BS!! BS!!!

Our patriot forefathers deserve better. Britain robbed them the opportunity to abolish slavery, which in turn robbed us(you and I, now, those who can read this) the opportunity of being able to proclaim that we abolished slavery before we even proclaimed Independence!!! And in turn, this article robs both us and those early abolitionists even of the recognition that they deserve for the work they did.

As if they didn't exist.

We give the CRT'ers what they want by refusing to acknowledge that WE were correct on anti-slavery well over 50 years before Britain and any of the others and instead acting like slavery was just bacteria in the air - "oh it was just everywhere". No it wasn't just everywhere! Stop saying that!

FRANCE was the bad guy on slavery, not America.

SPAIN was the bad guy on slavery, not America. And most importantly

BRITAIN was the bad guy on slavery, not America.

We need to stop playing this mickey mouse game and start specifically pointing to these evil empires with the resolve that Reagan had for calling out yet another evil empire, cause that's what they were.

Caustic Historians don't deny this, Pre-Revolutionary abolitionism and legislation is a quietly acknowledged fact. They just don't make noise about it because it doesn't fit the narrative.

Only we as conservatives are going to make the noise. And if we aren't the ones making the noise to defend America, this article most certainly doesn't make the noise, that leaves no one left to fight for America for it's distinct and valuable efforts from between 1770 to 1776.

THAT is what makes America truely exceptional. When the entire world was doing slavery, our guys were the exception and put abolition laws on the governor's desk. That's the exception to the rule.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.