Dumbassery writ large. Perhaps the show title is literal? Armchair ex-spurt, stick to armchairs. Thanks piers morgan. Every once in a while some intelligence shows through.
1 posted on
05/17/2021 10:46:51 AM PDT by
rktman
To: rktman
> “Like so much of the absurd Meghan-inspired psychobabble that spews out of [Harry’s] mouth, none of this makes any sense, and he clearly doesn’t understand what he’s saying either,” Morgan wrote. <
Lots of folks here find fault with Piers Morgan, and rightly so. For one thing, he’s weak on private gun ownership.
But what he wrote there is pure gold.
2 posted on
05/17/2021 10:53:28 AM PDT by
Leaning Right
(I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: rktman
Does Piers only like the odd-numbered Amendments? He certainly thinks #2 is “bonkers”.
3 posted on
05/17/2021 10:53:37 AM PDT by
Campion
(What part of "shall not be infringed" don't they understand?)
To: rktman
I’m wondering about whether the First Amendment needs to go also, but likely from a different angle.
All that I see now is a media operating as an arm of a political party, but protected against outright lies and slander by the First Amendment.
So maybe keep the First Amendment, but it damn clear that the media has to be ACCOUNTABLE if they decide to destroy someone without EVIDENCE to back it up.
4 posted on
05/17/2021 10:56:00 AM PDT by
BobL
(I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's, I just don't tell anyone, like most here.)
To: rktman
For his thoughts? Or for his thoughtless statement?
5 posted on
05/17/2021 10:56:50 AM PDT by
stanne
To: rktman
“You can capitalize or exploit what’s not said rather than uphold what is said.”
I find that following news is much more informative by noting what is not reported by the MSM rather than by what they actually do report. I’m beginning to appreciate the skills of readers of Правда and Известия.
6 posted on
05/17/2021 11:14:44 AM PDT by
hanamizu
To: rktman
First, he isn’t “Prince” Harry, he’s just Harry the nobody.
Second, Harry is an idiot who is shocked to find a country where people demand defend themselves.
7 posted on
05/17/2021 11:20:53 AM PDT by
SaxxonWoods
(Any comment might be sarcasm, or not. It depends. Often I'm not sure either.)
To: rktman
“It’s the same mindset that makes Meghan think she can complain to the bosses of TV networks when presenters like me refuse to believe her lies — and have them removed from their jobs if we don’t apologize for our impertinence.”She doesn't "think she can", Piers; she did.
8 posted on
05/17/2021 11:24:08 AM PDT by
Sans-Culotte
(11/3-11/4/2020 - The USA became a banana republic.)
To: rktman
Princes do not use the word “bonkers”
10 posted on
05/17/2021 11:31:34 AM PDT by
exinnj
To: rktman
Well, Just Harry is sure running with that free speech part.
11 posted on
05/17/2021 11:34:08 AM PDT by
bgill
To: rktman
Didn’t this guy use to fly helicopters in the Army?
15 posted on
05/17/2021 2:37:18 PM PDT by
slouper
(LWRC SPR 5.5 6)
To: rktman
It’s very simple, you third rate prince of a crumbled empire we defeated in two wars and then saved from defeat in two more wars. The First Amendment is why you and your wife left that wretched country and enables you to make a fortune in America.
16 posted on
05/17/2021 4:31:52 PM PDT by
monkeyshine
(live and let live is dead)
To: rktman
18 posted on
05/18/2021 4:20:46 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Those aren't masks. They're muzzles. )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson