To: where's_the_Outrage?
Exactly.
That struck me as really unusual. They must have traded off on a different case.
6 posted on
05/17/2021 10:12:52 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory. )
To: xzins
Why would they trade off to make a decision unanimous? I would think a trade off would be useful in a close case.
23 posted on
05/17/2021 10:54:03 AM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
To: xzins
That struck me as really unusual. They must have traded off on a different case.
Lol...good to see lots of others here are as cynical as I am.
Wanna bet they trade off on a more important 2A case coming up?
26 posted on
05/17/2021 11:04:53 AM PDT by
SecAmndmt
(Aim small, miss small)
To: xzins
“ They must have traded off on a different case.”
Must be, three new puppets would never have voted to keep our rights. Not after they did away with them in the election case.
49 posted on
05/17/2021 2:40:10 PM PDT by
CottonBall
(MAKE REPUBLICANS WHIGS AGAIN!)
To: xzins
So silly. I wish people would keep their conspiracy theories to themselves, especially when there is zero proof - zero proof.
67 posted on
05/18/2021 9:58:47 AM PDT by
Dave W
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson