Posted on 05/15/2021 6:19:31 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
Hmmm. Guess crimes against humanity have never been prosecuted. /sarc. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimes_against_humanity
Excellent! This has been nothing but a fraud.
I can only imagine the number of HIPAA violations these as swipes have committed .
See, it only maters if us lemmings violate the law, not them.
And oh yes, Crimes against Humanity post WWII resulted in many death sentences and executions.
Well, they haven’t really.
Read your own link.
This is a rampaging elephant in the room that our MSM will not tell us about because they are guilty too.
Just remember that the innocent do not commit guilty acts.
------------------
Well, they haven’t really. Read your own link.
Read it and weep, Herr Eichman.
(excerpt)
In the 1990s, several authorities asserted that ethnic cleansing as carried out by elements of the Bosnian Serb army was genocide.[10]
These included a resolution by the United Nations General Assembly and three convictions for genocide in German courts (the convictions were based upon a wider interpretation of genocide than that used by international courts).[11]
In 2005, the United States Congress passed a resolution declaring that "the Serbian policies of aggression and ethnic cleansing meet the terms defining genocide."[12]
The Srebrenica massacre was found to be an act of genocide by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, a finding upheld by the ICJ.[13] On 24 March 2016, former Bosnian Serb leader and the first president of the Republika Srpska, Radovan Karadžić, was found guilty of genocide in Srebrenica, war crimes, and crimes against humanity and sentenced to life imprisonment.[14]
If you ever get tired of being wrong ALL THE TIME, I can tutor you. Classes are held M/W/F from 11 to 3.
Wear your clip-on tie.
Except there is no statute for “crimes against humanity” in any court.
It’s a catch all phrase they throw in.
Genocide is the crime.
good for them!!!
Yes. Which falls under the rubrik of 'crimes against humanity'.
(excerpt)
Unlike war crimes, crimes against humanity can be committed during peace or war.[2] They are not isolated or sporadic events, but are part either of a government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority.
War crimes, murder, massacres, dehumanization, genocide, ethnic cleansing, deportations, unethical human experimentation, extrajudicial punishments including summary executions, use of weapons of mass destruction, state terrorism or state sponsoring of terrorism, death squads, kidnappings and forced disappearances, use of child soldiers, unjust imprisonment, enslavement, torture, rape, political repression, racial discrimination, religious persecution and other human rights abuses may reach the threshold of crimes against humanity if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice.
That might explain why such a serious disease had so many “asymptomatic” cases.
unethical human experimentation
So we don't even need to be talking about 'genocide'.
From your link:
Crimes against humanity are not codified in an international convention, although there is currently an international effort to establish such a treaty, led by the Crimes Against Humanity Initiative.
There is no authoritative codification of Crimes Against Humanity.
Of course, I suppose one could run to the ICC with accusations of it. See if you can get them to prosecute and punish.
We don’t even have to be talking about mass vaccinations.
We could and should be talking about the experimentation of lockdowns and “universal masking.”
>>> BS. I’d like to find the source of that article. It probably goes back to corrupt swamp creatures desperate to delegitimize opposition.
Nothing like objectivity...
I’m sure you’ll find exactly what you want to.
There is no authoritative codification of Crimes Against Humanity.
In my above post, there was listed several examples of what constitute a crime against humanity. That's why the call it crimes (plural) against humanity, genocide being just one of them.
There's no point in playing semantical games just to win an argument on the internet.
These people are working up a case for 'crimes against humanity'. Whatever the actual unlawful acts are, they will qualify as a 'crime against humanity' as well as the actual crime (i.e. genocide, unethical experimentation on humans, etc).
I expect they will file in some type of international court. I don't know how international law works or doesn't work in the U.S. court system.
Do you like to argue just to argue?
Oh I hope this is true, I honestly don’t know what to believe anymore.
Are you for real ? Do you not believe the Democrats have been involved in massive voter fraud?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.