Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ifinnegan

Exactly!

AT THE VERY LEAST, the pipeline control system ought to be an ENTIRELY SEPARATE network, with ZERO internet connectivity.


19 posted on 05/15/2021 11:09:11 AM PDT by HKMk23 (INADEQUACY: If this keeps up, we may not be able to let you help us anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: HKMk23

AT THE VERY LEAST, the pipeline control system ought to be an ENTIRELY SEPARATE network, with ZERO internet connectivity.

Like a Dominion voting machine.


26 posted on 05/15/2021 11:46:22 AM PDT by freefdny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: HKMk23

Yes, there should be a much isolation as possible, but going w/o
access to the internet...

Do you think it would be a good idea to have the ppl go back to control by radio? That was one of the ways it “used” to be done.

This isn’t the 30s or 50s, or even the 80s.

How else are you going to connect 100s or even 1000s of miles of pipe and more importantly valves, sensors, and timing devices together to coordinate the different products and tanks that’s running through the system? Don’t forget the important systems like leak and theft detection.

Yes, they could have dedicated fiber optic running along the RoW, but almost none are handled that way. I know of a few that are, but these are definitely outliers.

Carriers today handle multiple products in the same line, with much less transmix than ever before. Running manual is a very risky proposition, too many high likelihood, high consequence scenarios too allow for anything real duration.


42 posted on 05/15/2021 10:06:56 PM PDT by Oil Object Insp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson