“...Because it is literally unknowable at this point.”
This of course is true.
Every medical decision a Physician makes as well as the individual involved is a matter of risk/reward.
Some decisions are ridiculously easy as to the massive benefit to risk ratio involved, some, however, are pretty close.
For my wife and I, this was one of those “pretty close” calls due to the combination of factors including our age, present existing health status and vulnerability.
We both made an educated decision as to which course of action potentially offered the least risk for us amidst the existing facts as we know them.
If we had both been younger and in top health, our decision would have been decidedly different.
exactly.
I’m 59.5, in great health, and I have considerable back stock of ivermectin, D, C, Zinc, azithromycin, etc.
I have healthy skepticism of software updates (mRNA vaccines) having been in the software industry. What could possibly go wrong with the first software update in history?
People will decide differently, as their perception of risks varies over time. That’s freedom, and I’m PRO.
Oh yeah, plus melatonin, famotidine, elderberry extract, aspirin, an expectorant ...