None of these guys calls out Liz for not living up to Reagan’s standard in her treatment of Trump.
Since when does Trump, or anyone else for that matter, have to be silent in the face of criticism? Get over it, Liz.
Reagan sought peace with Russia/Soviets. Cheney is always seeking war because she is a psycho.
Reagan would not approve of her.
This ‘historian’ things he knows Reagan, but, Reagan would have invoked his ‘11th commandment’ against Liz, saying:
“Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican.”
She doesnt have a “contrary opinion” - she’s actively working with the communist Democrats to subvert this nation.
The theme is simply that the weakling, cringing, mealy-mouthed, back-stabbing, whipped-dog establishment Republicans are the "true" face of the party and that Trump is not. Why? Because they say so. Spare us, please.
Reagan's Eleventh Comandment: Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican.
Shirley, you jest.
Yeah, like she knows! Is she channelling Reagan or something?
The only evidence the “historian” offers that Reagan would accept Liz Cheney’s leadership is that he accepted GHW Bush, which rather makes the opposite point ( Although Bush wasn’t openly derisive and defiant of the President like Cheney.)
Bush was in fact Reagan’s single biggest mistake, purging his staff, destroying his legacy, undermining his economic and other policies and finally losing the base and the office for the party.
IMO Liz Cheney is one of the all time top violators of Reagan’s 11th commandment, along with Romney. For that Reagan would have, or at least should have, relieved anyone like her of power..
Apparently this douche nozzle “forgot” about the vote to impeach her own party’s President. Look at the D’s who voted to impeach Bill Clinton (Virgil Goode, Ralph Hall, Paul McHale, Charles Stenholm and Gene Taylor). Why haven’t you heard of them?
So, if Liz Chaney had supported the attempt to impeach Ronald Reagan because of Iran-Contra, Reagan would have approved of that?
Cheney’s “crime” is supporting Democrats and defacto the progressive agenda. There’s absolutely nothing conservative about that.
Oh poo.
He’d whisper in her ear and she’d step down.
Wasn’t the eleventh comment of Reagan to not fight the party?
“Historian: Ronald Reagan Would Disapprove of Cheney Treatment..”
BS..he would have demanded it because he was a great guy, a patriot and despised scum.
We are in different times. I don’t much think Reagan would favor the uniparty or Pubs like Cheney who would undermine grass-roots Pub
And our only "crime" is that we wish to wash our hands of Liz.
See how that works?
No of course Liz Cheney, the "historian" and their ilk don't because they apparently don't have any self awareness.
It’s not for “simply for having a contrary opinion.”
She’s been a DS swamp creature her entire life. That acorn didn’t fall far from the tree, either.
She voted FOR impeachment against Trump when she had to have known the Article of Impeachment was a 100% cooked-up, false charge.
That’s far more than having a contrary opinion. She was trying to inflict damage a fellow Republican while showing solidarity with globalist, DS Democrats.
It is not just her disagreement with Donald Trump that we find objectionable. It is that she chooses to counter most things that the Republicans stand for. Simply put, she is a jackass!!!