Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Safrguns

A trucking company domiciled outside CA that makes deliveries to or from CA would not be covered by this law. It’s the local trucking contractors who never cross a state line who have the most exposure here.


31 posted on 05/09/2021 7:19:48 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("And once in a night I dreamed you were there; I canceled my flight from going nowhere.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

>>> A trucking company domiciled outside CA that makes deliveries to or from CA would not be covered by this law.

AHHH... then it’s not really a ban on independents.

It’s a ban on free enterprise within the state.

Problem will solve itself.

Unions will choke on their own vomit.


38 posted on 05/09/2021 8:12:44 AM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

HA! And you should see the truckers who have relocated here in N’western Az as a result of this.

I can think of abt ten in my small area of the neighborhood right now. And thats been since a year ago. Most of the lots sold here are no smaller than 2 and a third acres.


40 posted on 05/09/2021 8:30:00 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child
No true.
Interstate Trucking companies that have owner operators domiciled in California are telling them they are going to terminate their leases.
Many are getting Arizona addresses.
46 posted on 05/09/2021 9:14:03 AM PDT by sausageseller (If you want to cut your own throat, don't come to me for a bandage. M, Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson