Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tennessee Legislature Passes Bill Requiring Absentee Ballot Watermarks
breitbart ^ | 3 May 2021 | KYLE OLSON

Posted on 05/03/2021 7:31:36 PM PDT by MarvinStinson

The Tennessee legislature included an amendment to an election-related bill that would require a “non-visible” watermark on every absentee ballot.

The Tennessee Election Integrity Act, which passed the Senate 27-0 and the House 92-1, would go into effect in January 2022 if Gov. Bill Lee (R-TN) signs it, the Center Square reported.

AD According to a bill summary:

Under present law, signature verification is the final verification necessary before a counting board counts absentee ballots. Under this amendment, signature verification will remain part of the verification process but will not be the final verification. This amendment requires a counting board official to verify that the absentee ballots contain the watermark and reject any ballot that does not bear the watermark.

A co-sponsor of the bill, state Rep. Jason Zachary (R) said the measure “requires a non-visible watermark be placed on every mailed absentee ballot, further ensuring the integrity of ballots and elections” in the state.

“No watermark, the ballot is rejected,” he added.

“This is a good bill, a very good bill, and I want to thank you for bringing it,” he added.

More from The Center Square:

Rep. Bruce Griffey, R-Paris, said there are five vendors in the state that provide the paper for absentee ballots and all are able to put the watermarks on the ballot.

After some debate on the cost of previously purchased paper without the watermarks, Griffey said the estimated cost would be $105 per election commission.

He disputed the notion that the bill’s intent was to suppress votes.

“I think this bill is to ensure that absentee ballots that go out have an additional security measure,” Griffey said.

“All Tennesseans desire secure elections,” state Rep. Jerome Moon (R) said. “Thank you for a very well thought out, very researched piece of legislation.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: watermarks

1 posted on 05/03/2021 7:31:36 PM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson
I can hear the Democrat wailing right now!

Watermarks are racist! Watermarks are badges of slavery! Watermarks are White supremacist dog whistles!

2 posted on 05/03/2021 7:49:11 PM PDT by Thommas (The snout of the camel is in the tent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson
Every ballot should have a watermark.

Every ballot should have a bar code or QR code so it can be scanned only once.

Every ballot should be printed with consecutive numbers or a random alogarithm code which is verified when scanned.

Every ballot should be printed on paper treated with a specific ultra violet dye during manufacture.

Every ballot should be printed on a paper size that cannot be purchased at Office Max.

NO ballot should be able to be printed on a home or officer desktop printer.

Every ballot should be manufactured with a security strip as is our currency.

If ballots are scanned by optical readers it should be simple to add unique security features.

These are but a few of the security measures I hope will be implemented before the midterms.

Few or none will be because Republicans don't care about securing the next election. They'll wait until the votes are certified and them stomp their feet.

I hold out little hope the next election will be any more secure than the last one.

I blame Republicans.

3 posted on 05/03/2021 7:51:36 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thommas

This is a band-aid on a severed aorta.


4 posted on 05/03/2021 7:53:41 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

It’s a start, but mail in ballots are still problematic.


5 posted on 05/03/2021 8:21:49 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> --- )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

What’s the point of having counterfeit-proof currency if ballots aren’t also counterfeit-proof?


6 posted on 05/03/2021 8:27:42 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Does that really do any good? If the watermark is leaked it would be impossible to tell a phony from a real McCoy.


7 posted on 05/03/2021 9:13:53 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
I hold out little hope the next election will be any more secure than the last one.

I blame Republicans.

I blame Coca-Cola.

8 posted on 05/03/2021 10:18:13 PM PDT by patriciaruth (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1993905/posts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson; All

Watermarks are a good idea. However, Signatures should be on the BALLOT... not on the envelope. Duh.


9 posted on 05/03/2021 11:59:00 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn’t common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Many of these ballots are printed legitimately, but are not voted legitimately. This will not help with that.


10 posted on 05/04/2021 12:45:04 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Wouldn’t a database be better for this?

Match the ballot with the database entry and check it off. This eliminates duplicates. Any ballots that came in that are not in the database get investigated.


11 posted on 05/04/2021 5:45:17 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Keep the Faith. Everything happens for a reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson
would go into effect in January 2022

Why not before the 2022 election?

12 posted on 05/04/2021 5:46:31 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

January 2022 is before November 2022. (Am I missing something?)


13 posted on 05/04/2021 5:48:00 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (I prefer the challenges of life to the guaranteed existence - Prof. Dean Alfange)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

LOL, nope


14 posted on 05/04/2021 5:56:04 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson