Posted on 05/03/2021 9:50:28 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
"... perhaps the different pallets are for different ballot characteristics - e.g. mail in ballots that have no fold marks in them (would have to be fraudulent). Other indications of fraud would be copied ballots on bond paper with watermarks (SoS confirmed NO ballots have watermarks), etc."
On second thought, if the boxes are separated by ballot characteristics, they would have had to have been separated prior to being brought into the sequestering areas to begin with. The inspectors do not separate the ballots during their inspection process, they all go back into the original box they were given initially.
Oh yeah, you just wait until the report comes out, it will be devastating. </sarcastic boom.>
Oh. He’s not letting it go. Stand back
I appreciate that fear, but the reality is, you cannot replace a fraudulent ballot, with yet another fraudulent ballot, with the end result being a legal and legitimate ballot.
The law requires all ballots, images, flash drives, etc be held for 22 months.
Much of the fraud identified will be vectors that are incontrovertible, such as Dead Voters, Minors voting, out of state voters, etc.
Peter Navarro’s report does a phenomenal job of identifying the different buckets of fraud and can be read here: https://peternavarro.com/the-navarro-report/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.