Posted on 05/02/2021 7:19:11 AM PDT by rktman
It was back in 2013 that the Supreme Court of Canada stated, astoundingly, that the Truth was not a defense against “hate crime” charges. Now this philosophy may be manifesting itself in Spain, where a populist political party daring to claim that migrants get more government money than retirees is being investigated for “incitement to hatred.”
As Breitbart reports, “Spanish populist party VOX is being investigated over a campaign poster that compares monthly spending on migrant minors to monthly spending on Spanish pensioners.”
“The poster [below], which was launched ahead of the May 4th elections in Madrid, claims ‘A [migrant minor], €4,700 [£4,080/$5,670] per month, your grandmother, a €426 [£370/$514] pension per month’ and shows a picture of an elderly woman and a young man with his face covered by a scarf and wearing a hoodie,” the site continued.
(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...
(hate crime = any registered Republican)
As a nation commits cultural suicide, the absurdities abound.
.
Stop with the hate cr**. Hate is not a crime. Hate is an emotion.
> As a nation commits cultural suicide, the absurdities abound. <
Lenin said: “The Capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them.”
I suppose the illegals can say: “The West will give us the rope with which we will hang them.”
Guess you missed the memo. :-}
Where’s Francisco Franco when you need him.
Not surprised,,,,,,Spain is a nothing.
Didn’t Spain also give human rights to animals or chimps or something?
From Ancient History:
So, if you feel like givin’ me
A lifetime of devotion
I second that emotion
The ONLY question should be whether the claim is true. Telling the truth cannot be a crime.
The bearded ones are watching eagerly. As Spain deteriorates, the burka crowd remembers when they had taken over Spain, and waits patiently for the right time to go in and restore sharia rule.
Wasn’t Spain one of the EU countries that welcomed boat people and ‘immigrants’??
Seriously... what were they thinking?
“A [migrant minor], €4,700 [£4,080/$5,670] per month, your grandmother, a €426 [£370/$514] pension per month”
Even if true it’s comparing two different things - and I assume that’s the underlying issue here.
Should be “a migrant minor v resident minor” and/or “a migrant pensioner (senior) v resident pensioner (senior)”.
Even in the UK the cost to the state of any child’s education alone, comes close to the state pension for any senior.
This is thier great reset, you get screwed and they hand over your money to the minorities for free
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.