Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
What we need, frankly, is a constitutional amendment rolling back notions of liability to what they were 50 or 60 years ago.

The Left complains about the special exemption given to gun makers from liability lawsuits. But in fact, no manufacturer of anything should ever be held liable for the illegal use of their product.

Similarly in this case, the presence or absence of any infectious disease (unless it's a medical facility) is outside the purview of any employer and so outside their liability and only the government should be able to issue mandates like this with explicit limitations even on that power.

7 posted on 04/27/2021 7:22:35 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: pierrem15
What we need, frankly, is a constitutional amendment rolling back notions of liability to what they were 50 or 60 years ago.

It's more complicated than that.

For one thing, you'd need a constitutional amendment to completely change the way Federal and state courts work. Torts are covered by state law, not Federal law -- unless the issue at hand involves a Federal party or an issue covered by Federal law. What you're proposing would completely revolutionize the way civil lawsuits are adjudicated in the future.

16 posted on 04/27/2021 8:11:51 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("And once in a night I dreamed you were there; I canceled my flight from going nowhere.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson