America’s fake, printed, fiat money is not only corrupting our economy, its corrupting society. Fed.gov and our central bank can effectively issue debt and print money at will -- and then turn around and force 1000 different leftist social engineering schemes down America’s throat.
Oh, no! Where am I?
This is where the wheat get separated from the chaff, folks.
RE: “... filed a lawsuit in response to a February order from the Department of Housing and Urban Development that forces any entities that receive federal dollars covered by the Fair Housing Act”
An therein lies the problem. That is why it is a BAD IDEA for schools (Especially Christian and Religious schools ) to receive ANY Federal Dollars. With this you are held hostage to rules that might CONFLICT with your deeply held religious beliefs.
Grove City College realized this a long time ago and refused to accept any Federal Money ( This college is thriving ). Hillsdale College is the other college that comes to mind.
“that forces any entities that receive federal dollars”
Well, there you go. You can’t serve two masters, so choose one.
“Christian university sues to block HUD order forcing male student placement in female dorms”
The Army of Satan continues it’s attack on Christians.
If Christians cannot receive government money without strings attached then Christians should not be forced to pay the taxes that the government uses to pay out that money. The government has no money that it does not first get from the people.
Do they have trans-freaks at this university? Why would such people want to study there? Wouldn’t they feel unwelcome? Aren’t the students at this university required to sign some statement of faith? I think such a statement could solve this problem. A student would confirm that he won’t oppose Christian faith and morality while being a student there.
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Patriots are reminded that the states have never given the federal government the specific powers to tax and spend in the name of either INTRAstate schooling or housing, the constitutionally undefined HUD unconstitutional imo.
In fact, President Thomas Jefferson, in a State of the Union address, had used education as an example of a power that the states would first need to amend the Constitution so that Congress could stick its big nose (my words) into intrastate education, the states never amending constitution for that purpose.
"On a few articles of more general and necessary use, the suppression in due season will doubtless be right, but the great mass of the articles on which impost is paid is foreign luxuries, purchased by those only who are rich enough to afford themselves the use of them. Their patriotism would certainly prefer its continuance and application to the great purposes of the public education, roads, rivers, canals, and such other objects of public improvement as it may be thought proper to add to the constitutional enumeration of federal powers [emphases added].”—Thomas Jefferson : Sixth Annual Message to Congress
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Also, Justice Joseph Story had not only likewise indicated that the states have never expressly constitutionally given the feds the specific power to tax and spend for intrastate schooling, but had also indicated that the care of poor people is uniquely a state power issue, not the business of the feds.
"The power to regulate manufactures, not having been confided to congress, they have no more right to act upon it, than they have to interfere with the systems of education, the poor laws, or the road laws, of the states [emphases added]. Congress is empowered to lay taxes for revenue, it is true; but there is no power to encourage, protect, or meddle with manufactures." —Joseph Story, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1, Commentaries on the Constitution 2
Finally, the only sex-related right that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect limits, evidenced by the 19th Amendment, limits the feds to protect sex-related discrimination only in the context of voting rights issues, school dormitories clearly not within the scope of voting rights concerns.
"19th Amendment:The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation [emphasis added]."
As a side note to the fed's very limited powers to make anti-sex discrimination laws, consider that probably most of the Civil Rights act of 1964 and its titles are based on constitutionally nonexistent federal government powers.
Getting back to unconstitutional federal government overreach exemplified by the misguided, fraudulently-elected (imo) Biden Administration, patriots need to primary (2022) federal and state lawmakers who don’t agree to do the following about state powers stolen by the corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification feds.
When the federal government accuses someone of violating a law, judges and law enforcement officials should be required to do the following.
Judges and law-enforcement officials need to inform the accused of the constitutional clause(s) that arguably justifies the allegedly broken law for further scrutiny of the constitutionality of that law, especially where unconstitutional federal peacetime gun control laws are concerned imo.
If a male is assigned to a female dorm, the girls should gang up and kick his butt out.