Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RC one

One of the hazards of scientifically naive people attempting to read scientific articles is the failure to understand what they read. No serious researcher ever relies on the introductory abstract.

These are written to satisfy editors, not to convey accurate information. Turn to the Method section and the Results section and peruse the statistics. The Leung et al article clearly documents that there was no statistically significant difference between mask and no mask conditions for hypothetical transmission of Covid 19.


45 posted on 04/17/2021 4:23:47 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard (resist the narrative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: hinckley buzzard; RC one

From Results:

“We detected coronavirus in respiratory droplets and aerosols in 3 of 10 (30%) and 4 of 10 (40%) of the samples collected without face masks, respectively, but did not detect any virus in respiratory droplets or aerosols collected from participants wearing face masks, this difference was significant in aerosols and showed a trend toward reduced detection in respiratory droplets (Table 1b).”


50 posted on 04/17/2021 4:36:13 PM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: hinckley buzzard
All right. Let's talk about the meat and potatoes of the study then. This is what it found:

=====================================


52 posted on 04/17/2021 4:43:03 PM PDT by RC one (When a bunch of commies start telling you that you don't need an AR15, you really need an AR15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson