bagster wrote: “Plenty of independent and ‘whistleblower’ science pointing out the foolishness and danger of your Fauci vax.”
None of which is sufficiently credible to published in a reputable scientific or medical journal.
So?
And who controls what gets published in your 'reputable scientific or medical journals'?
Oh, guys like Fauci you say? And before you say, 'Fauci doesn't control that reeeeeeeeee', notice I said 'guys LIKE your buddy Fauci'.
Piss on your 'reputable' scientific medical or science journals. With all due respect.
Is it sufficient to state, with evidence from the manufacturer’s own documents that those who take the jab are still in the trial phase...test subjects...until the trials phases are over in late ‘22, early ‘23?
...because that’s the “science” of this trial phase. They’re lab rats.
Also, were they given informed consent?
...because not one person I know of, who participated in these trials, has been given an informed consent documented to sign. Not one.
Facts conveniently left out of the propaganda narrative.