Then, when someone DOES try to blow the whistle (usually a non-headh-honcho, having a pang of conscience),
Well, are they a head honcho? No, so they don't have all the forensic evidence, they're not high enough up the conspiracy to.
So know-it-alls like you come in and demand a high level of proof, and when it isn't *instantly* available, you go "oh, a nut case conspiracy theory".
Works ALMOST every time.
I don't know if you intended to be abrasive, so I'll not take this personally.
FWIW, I am an old-school student of research and rigorous peer review. I've seen long-established science challenged regularly, and as time goes on, I fully expect that things we know as truth today will be modified. That's the nature of science. Nothing is fact unless and until it stands up to every possible attack against it.
That said, this vaccine and the entire effort around it is being attacked and torn down from every angle, we're just not being fed these "facts" by the media. Spending a little time in a rabbit hole of research can be good for the soul. I have no problem admitting that things I've known as "true" in the past didn't stand up to scrutiny once I dove in. If you're an honest person, you won't sit on a media-controlled pile of "facts" claiming authority. Let those facts be questioned, and when proven right again and again, then, and only then, will you have earned the title of "authority." Hiding behind "science" does not make your worldview true.