Supreme Court Rules Against California's Limits On In-Home Religious Gatherings

Fox News ^ | 04.10.2021 | Brie Stimson

[USA Conservative]

Good something is finally happening in California. But it shouldn't have to take the supreme court to make a decision like this. This was a 5 to 4 ruling. Religious freedom is under fire.

[Bayard]

This is a huge ruling, essentially establishing that religious activities have to be allowed if any gathering is allowed.

[ronnie raygun]

fraudulent voting no

[chief lee runamok]

"Chief Justice John Roberts dissented.."

john roberts, American traitor.

[sport]

"Chief Justice John Roberts dissented.."

As expected.

[ronnie raygun]

Crap care Roberts is compromised and a traitor

[gov_bean_ counter]

A totalitarian.

[stars & stripes forever]

RE; Roberts

Someone must own him He should be removed from the bench. Thankful this ruling was allowed to stand.

[Diogenesis]

ooops. not enough sacrificial white helpless babies
were sent this time to Malta, the Vatican,
and to the Chamber of antiConstitutional-predator Roberts
to wake the sex/baby trafficker-Traitor, and his beard,up?

[canuck_conservative]

Good something is finally happening in California

Actually this happened in Washington, NOT California ... and that's the real source of the problem - virtually the entire CA judiciary consists of tyrannical idiots more concerned with pushing trendy ideologies than obeying the Law (or common sense)

[Czech_Occidentalist]

He should be removed from the bench.

---

The Democrats would gladly remove him from the bench and replace him with someone who would make Elena Kagan look reasonable.

[vespa300]

Has the “wise Latina” Sotomayer ever once voted with the conservatives? I mean why even show up. Just mail it in for her.

She’s the “angry Latina” who hates everything white and America. Fool.....you think we’re stupid?

[ScottinVA]

Roberts has simply become as dependable a liberal vote as RBG.

[HamiltonJay]

Roberts stand is indefensible...

George Bush’s gif that will keep on giving...

Jackass

[Czech_Occidentalist]

Has the “wise Latina” Sotomayer ever once voted with the conservatives?

---

Actually, yes. There’s a significant number of cases that are decided unanimously. Those cases are usually decided early in the term.

[13Sisters76]

It’s past time to investigate and, possibly, impeach, John Roberts. He got seriously hinky when the Epstein scandal broke and started making troubling decisions and raging around the other justices and staff when it was shown that HIS name showed up on the logs of the “lolita express” TWICE. Time to find out what the left has on him that has influenced his decisions.

[Stravinsky]

There are a lot of apolitical cases decided unanimously, but on the big, divisive cases, she’s pretty much 100% leftist. Horrible justice.

[stevem]

It looks like Roberts has effectively taken Ginsberg’s place at the nuttiest justice.

[vespa300]

Yeah, she’s the worse ever I think. Mediocre intelligence and contempt for White America. Bad combo. She got the job thanks to a subtle form of affirmative action. Has no business in the same room as a Scalia or Bork, etc. Amateur hour thinker with hate.

[Ge0ffrey]

Has Roberts officially gone over to the dark side?