Posted on 04/04/2021 4:35:10 AM PDT by Old Yeller
STORY AT-A-GLANCE Bill Gates owns a minimum of 242,000 acres of U.S. farmland in Washington, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, California and multiple other states Gates has a big vision for all that land, but unfortunately it doesn’t involve organic, biodynamic or regenerative farming methods, which are needed to heal ecosystems and produce truly sustainable, nourishing food for future generations Gates, along with Pat Brown, founder of imitation meat company Impossible Foods, supports GMOs, agricultural chemicals and technology as the future of farming Gates believes switching to synthetic beef is the solution to reducing methane emissions; Impossible Foods was co-funded by Google, Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates When you own the land, you also own the water that’s beneath it; for those who control resources like food and water, power is limitless
(Excerpt) Read more at noqreport.com ...
I won’t eat it.
You can have my delicious portion.
It would have been better if we had stuck with UNIX and its derivatives.
It’s amazing all the bad science that’s been attached to glyphosate.
If you have looked at Gates you have seen evil.
The above descriptions of water rights is just plain wrong.
Many states have explicit water rights-—and owning the land doe NOT give you certain water rights.
This author didn’t do ANY homework. Bad set of assumptions.
Glycophosphate is found in cereal - not broken down.
Glycophosphate kills probiotics in the intestines.
Go beyond the Monsanto PR
Glycophosphate is found in cereal - not broken down.
Glycophosphate kills probiotics in the intestines.
—
That’s just more bad science from environmental NGOs and others - there is no legitimate scientific evidence that what you are repeating is in the slightest true.
Monsanto (now Bayer) is just one of dozens of companies all over the world that produce Glyphosate.
It would have been better if we had stuck with UNIX and its derivatives.
—
We did, and UNIX is the basis of Apple’s OS.
It is true, along with the increased risk of types of cancer.
If you want to eat poison, please have mine.
https://www.mygenefood.com/blog/why-glyphosate-is-dangerous-and-how-to-avoid-eating-it/
Why Glycophosphate is dangerous and how to avoid eating it
It is true, along with the increased risk of types of cancer.
—
I’m sorry, but you are grossly misinformed by the incessant misinformation drumbeat by the enviro-wackos who want people to eat their synthetic food by creating fear of eating meat, fish, and grains harvested by modern farms and commercial fishermen.
The cancer hoax is particularly egregious and dead wrong, unless you are a plant or have traded your human DNA for broadleaf plant DNA.
I did hear that Gates and Co. are coming out with a new product - food you are sure to enjoy, as it uses no glyphosate. Its called Green Soy or something like that - I forget the exact name, but you will know it when you see it.
I disagree, based on my own reading and study of biology.
I'm a conservative, so...
If you wish to use, consume, or idolize Glyco, it is your right.
If you subsequently die of a type of cancer associated with Glyco, you accepted that risk.
Do try to keep it on your side of the fence.
synthetic beef...........better check the salt content.....yikes
I disagree, based on my own reading and study of biology. I’m a conservative, so... If you wish to use, consume, or idolize Glyco, it is your right. If you subsequently die of a type of cancer associated with Glyco, you accepted that risk.
—
Well there are hundreds of scientist who have been studying glyphosate for decades plus many international organizations doing the same - you apparently the only one to reach the conclusion that Glyphosate is harmful to humans.
How many PhDs in all the various biological fields do you hold? How much field work have you done? How many papers have you authored on the subject? How many lab hours have you put in during the course of your “research”?
Are you saying you know more than hundreds of scientists all over the world in a myriad of biological disciplines? Or are you just an armchair scientist fearfully spouting off on your feelings masked with pseudo-science?
Science is not supposed to be political, therefore, any mention of politics is a losing argument.
“ Well there are hundreds of scientist who have been studying glyphosate for decade
Who were paid by Monsanto.
Your posted argument is filled with logical fallacies.
Still if that’s what comforts you and gives you confidence to consume glyco, go for it
I can buy the concentrate from about 10 different companies based of cost. Which of those companies have the deep pockets because they might have it on sale next week.
The rational fear of some things is good. In this case I would put this on the irrational side.
From the caliber of your knowledge of glyphosate, I have to wonder if you’d know a logical fallacy when it bit you on the rear end.
He looks like he’s been eating fake meat and drinking prune juice nonstop. Why is anyone listening to this megalomaniac? I predict he’ll end up like Howard Hughes—hidden away in a hotel room with long fingernails and hair down to his feet. He’s beginning to sound like he’s losing his grip.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.