To: Kaslin
I cannot see how federal legislation on this topic is even remotely Constitutional.
3 posted on
03/29/2021 5:10:43 AM PDT by
Wonder Warthog
(Not Responding to Seagull Snark)
To: Wonder Warthog
I cannot see how federal legislation on this topic is even remotely Constitutional.
—
what does Constitutional mean these days of a fraudulent regime put in place to please a foreign country (China)?
4 posted on
03/29/2021 5:15:57 AM PDT by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
To: Wonder Warthog
I cannot see how federal legislation on this topic is even remotely Constitutional. It's power-crazed Democraps' saber-rattling.
5 posted on
03/29/2021 5:16:25 AM PDT by
Liz
(Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. )
To: Wonder Warthog
“ I cannot see how federal legislation on this topic is even remotely Constitutional.”
***************
It’s not. The Constitution is very clear on this. And, it’s very likely this will wind up at the Supreme Court. HOWEVER, under the John Roberts court there’s no assurance that the court will accept the case much less rule against the Dems should it be accepted.
6 posted on
03/29/2021 5:47:37 AM PDT by
snoringbear
(,W,E.oGovernment is the Pimp, )
To: Wonder Warthog
Its not constitutional but we now live in a communist state.
8 posted on
03/29/2021 6:21:06 AM PDT by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson