Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: circlecity

Statistically, with a traditional pistol caliber, unless its a head shot, you have a 90% survival chance given immediate medical attention. Not so with a rifle round. The higher velocity changes the damage mechanics. That is why a rifle is always preferred to a pistol, and the only reason you have a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you never should have dropped. Unless its impractical to have the rifle of course, like while walking the mall.


115 posted on 03/23/2021 1:25:15 PM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: Magnum44
“Statistically, with a traditional pistol caliber, unless its a head shot, you have a 90% survival chance given immediate medical attention. ‘

In a shoot out situation where you are likely to take one or perhaps two rounds, then certainly a rifle round is deadly due to increased muzzle velocity, just as that’s true of a pistol caliber carbine. In an ambush situation where you are quite likely to take 4 or more rounds the chances of survival drop dramatically. In that scenario dead is dead. I also do think, for me at least, a full stock isn’t really “much better” than a brace to shoot from the shoulder with this weapon. I’ve shot 5.56 from a rifle/carbine using a classic wooden stock, full Magpul stock (with cheek riser), a skeleton magpul stock and a hand brace. I shoot the same with each out to 100-150 yards. There’s not enough recoil with a 5.56 to make much, if any, difference. Once you step to 30 cal. that can change.

117 posted on 03/23/2021 1:42:14 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson