signed,
Bagster,
The sole arbiter of truth.
Posted on 03/22/2021 5:47:43 PM PDT by Spirit of Liberty
signed,
Bagster,
The sole arbiter of truth.
It is if you want to roast hotdogs while camping.
"That's not productive" - any derp state flying monkey on t.v.
So the dog caught the car it was chasing. What now?
“Do you believe Biden won fair and square?”
I think the states elected him on Jan 6th.
Enough said. Now are these traitorous traits genetic or did you develop them later in life with a CCP pay check? I mean with Benedict Arnold, Washington peed in his Wheaties which turned him. His traitorous traits came later in life. Is it genetic, a paymaster or did rational thought pee in your Wheaties?
Remind me how many states quit counting when it became clear Trump won? How many of those states mysteriously discovered over the margins ballots for Biden to eek out a win? In how many of those discoveries how many votes were for Trump and how does that compare to the stats from earlier during the counts? I mean you cant be that stupid. Traitor is the only explanation that fits.
I don’t think accepting our Founders’ Constitution as a decider of elections is “traitorous”.
Just the opposite.
State legislatures could award the Presidential electoral votes by reading bird entrails if they wished. And anyone faithful to our Founders would accept it.
It’s up to state legislators- none of which sent an alternate slate to Congress- to dispute the results. No one else.
The fraud was so obvious and with so much evidence, that a caveman could see it.
Accepting the corrupt results and hiding behind the Constitution to do it, is that act of a malevolent traitor.
And supporting that and calling yourself a patriot is not much better, and may even be worse, since these s-stains are supposed to be representing us, the people.
People like you (useful idiots) should shuck their 'oh so proper' facades and act as if reality exists.
Then we can act as one force and put a stop to this usurpation of our country by foreign and domestic elements.
Any time now, mith. We're waiting.
Only the known fools here embrace this view that our Founders were just bumblers. ‘They’ know so much better...
Says it all IMO.
Some state legislatures had cause to send alternate slates IMO, but they didn’t.
Only the known fools here embrace this view that our Founders were suckers who would accept fraudulent electoral votes from the states and allow foreign and domestic enemies to assume control of the country.
[They] know so much better...Says it all IMO.
The wheels of the car either smoosh the dog, or the dog lets go of the car and figures out how to fight smarter, however that works out.
The more the MSM and the deep state protest, the further past “too much” they go.
“a true FR classic!”
A blatant idiot is not “classic” here.
Though sure there have been plenty.
But the “classic” ones have been more than mere disrupting idiots- they had class.
One I still remember-though not his name- declared Jim to be like someone who came out of the bathroom with a string of TP stuck to his shoe.
Yeah, that was wrong but at least it was witty!
Stupid people who disrupt merely by being stupid are not new here- but they are hardly “classic”.
- Idiot
- Stupid
How did you manage to leave out your favorite insult, 'fool'. I was about to ask you what you liked more, bacon or calling people fools.
Tell your students how somebody disagreeing with what you perceive to be the prevalent and dominant opinion (according to you) and offering a contrary opinion is 'disrupting', professor.
Not only do you have a hyper-inflated sense of your own importance, intelligence, and worth, but you talk down to people in the most condescending and patronizing manner.
The fact is, mith, you are wrong constantly and you resent anybody that points that fact out to you.
Its very babyish and you are the disruptor with your condescending name-calling and faux victim act.
Go tell that.
p.s. Your trips down memory lane do nothing to enhance your credibility, nobody cares, and they do not establish you as an authority figure nor does it make your wrong statements right.
Get used to being challenged, or go knit some socks by the fire and drink your metamucil. This forum may be a bit too rough for you.
Having said all that, you have a nice evening, mith.
Your friend,
Bagster
p.s. This line, and the subsequent essay, reeks of, shall I say, jealousy?
Afraid somebody might steal your spotlight, or somethin'?
There's enough internet for the both of us, mith. Let it go.
The original document is fine. It is how it has been corrupted. Lets start with the 17th. Lets talk about natural born citizens. So much. You live in an idealistic rose colored world because your head is so far up your rear you only see the rosy hue of your own rectum.
Mr. Lemiwinks:
She is laying a trap for the judge and dominion.
Idiots love to call our Founders “idealists”.
It’s the very definition of idiocy.
Is she now? And what would that trap be?
The Art of War and all that, eh?
No, Sidney Powell is not backtracking on the ‘Kraken’
This is not backtracking. This is not an admission that she didn’t really believe her own accusations against Dominion Voting Systems, nor does it indicate she was lying to everyone about “The Kraken.” The buzz going around on social media from both sides are based on the isolated statements and context added by whoever is sharing it. But the truth is very clear. She is fighting a $1.3 billion defamation lawsuit. It is incumbent on her attorneys to demonstrate defamation was neither intended nor did it occur based on Powell’s statements.
What the attorneys are trying to establish is that the circumstances surrounding her statements are protected as free speech because of three important factors. First, inflammatory and polarizing language are often used in political scenarios and reasonable people expect that to be the case. Second, her own lawsuits were based on facts that allowed for interpretation and reasonable people would understand that these were the opinions upon which she filed her suits. Third, and this is very important, she made her claims against Dominion Voting Systems based on facts that she disclosed in her lawsuit.
This is not in any way demonstrating that Powell is backtracking on her claims. Her attorneys are framing the situation in the best legal way possible for their client. The people who are taking the statements in the motion to dismiss out of context are either ignorant or being disingenuous in framing it as her reversing on her own opinions regarding the 2020 election and Dominion Voting Systems.
https://noqreport.com/2021/03/23/no-sidney-powell-is-not-backtracking-on-the-kraken/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.