Posted on 03/16/2021 3:18:32 AM PDT by gattaca
Concerns are being raised over what questions aren't being asked surrounding Joe Biden's pick for CIA director. One America's Chief White House correspondent Chanel Rion has more from Washington.
We used to have Kabuki Theater. They used to pretend to be “deeply concerned” about things — and then they’d approve things anyway.
Today, they just ignore it at the start. There are no rules. Just get your people in place. Why have any concerns about anything?
Former Obama Secy of State Hillary Clinton facilitated a uranium exchange with Russian law enforcement by former FBI Director (and current chief Deep State Trump inquisitor) Robert Mueller. The exchange was exposed via a recent Wikileaks publication of a secret cable between Hillary’s State Department and the Russian embassy.
Hillary sent Mueller to Moscow with orders to turn over a 10 gram sample of highly enriched uranium (HEU) which was obtained during a shadowy 2006 nuclear “sting” operation conducted in the Georgian Republic. The ostensible reason for the transfer was to engender further trust between Russian and American law enforcement in the area of nuclear materials and to learn more about how to trace nuclear materials.
But when it comes to Hillary and Russian uranium interests, the shady Uranium One deal cannot pass un-noted. There has been no real investigation into how Hillary gave permission for a Russian company to acquire a quarter of the North American uranium reserves AFTER after Russian interests poured hundreds of millions into the Clinton Foundation and gave Bill Clinton six figure speaking fees.
At the very least, this exchange raises serious questions about the ability of Robert Mueller to do his job as special prosecutor on the Russian collusion charges since he already has connections to major figures in Russian law enforcement. (Excerpt) Read more at americanlibertypac.com ...
CIRCA 2020 Russia/Uranium Scandal: 37-Pages of Evidence Show $145 Million Bribery Scandal Involving The Clinton Foundation
tg | 10/7/2020 | Evan / FR Posted on 10/7/2020, 10:03:21 AM by wrrock
The Uranium One controversy involves various theories surrounding the sale of Uranium One to Rosatom as a $145 million bribery scandal involving Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation. The FBI has refused to make important documents public. Read More About Russia/Uranium/Clinton Foundation Scandal (at web site)...Excerpt) toptradeguru.com ... Update: The Department of Justice announced an 11AM press conference today, 10/7/20. We think it will be about the Russia/Uranium scandal.
I believe she was the reporter who was kicked out of the White House Press Correspondents Association rotation for reporting REAL news.
The New York Times April 2015 published an article about the Clinton Foundation, its receipt of millions of dollars from foreign governments and other interests, and the U.S. government's involvement in Russia's stated goal to expand its control of the world's uranium market. All while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. The NY Times didn't reach a conclusion, but one question looms very large: As Secretary of State, did Hillary influence an international deal giving a Russian company 20% ownership of America's uranium production, in return for millions of dollars of cash donations to the Clinton Foundation?
Here is a list of 11 questionable items forming a chain of events:
1. September of 2005: Bill buddy, Canadian Frank Giustra, visits Kazakhstan with Bill Clinton. Days later, Giustra's company UrAsia wins a major uranium deal with the country.
2. 2006: Giustra donates $31 million to the Clinton Foundation.
3. February 2007: UrAsia merges with Uranium One and expands into the U.S..
4. June 2008: Russian atomic agency Rosatom begins talks to acquire Uranium One.
5. 2008 to 2010: Uranium One and UrAsia investors donate $8.65 million to Clinton Foundation.
6. June 2009: Rosatom acquires 17% of Uranium One.
7. 2010 to 2011: Millions more donated by Uranium One investors to Clinton Foundation.
8. June 2010: Rosatom requests Committee on Foreign Investment (of which the State Department is a member and its approval is needed) to approve a majority ownership in Uranium One, PROMISING NOT TO PURCHASE 100% of it, NOR TAKE IT PRIVATE.
9. June 2010: Bill Clinton receives $500,000 to speak at a conference held by the Russian investment bank involved in the Rosatom transactions.
10. October 2010: Committee APPROVES Rosatom's request to ACQUIRE A MAJORITY SHARE in Uranium One.
11. January 2013: Rosatom PURCHASES REMAINDER of Uranium One and takes it PRIVATE!.
============================
Mueller has done more damage during his 12 years as FBI director than any other — probably all directors put together... He has wasted money right and left. Amazingly, he’s hired people like [Andrew] Weissmann that worked with him and [Rod] Rosenstein in investigating the Russian illegal efforts to obtain our uranium which they quashed information in order to allow the sale to go through so that Hillary could get the $145 million for her foundation. So it is really outrageous. He’s covering for himself at the same time he’s trying to have a coup against President Trump.
SOURCE https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/06/09/gohmert_mueller_covering_involvement_in_clinton-uranium_deal_while_trying_to_have_a_coup_against_trump.html

Obama Admin. Misled About Uranium One
TruNews ^ | Dec 12, 2017 | Rick Wiles / FR Posted
In a letter to Energy Secretary Rick Perry and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairwoman Kristine Svinicki, Senate Environment & Public Works Committee Chairman John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) is demanding an explanation for how U.S. uranium left the country after the Uranium One deal.
The senator, who represents the home state of three of the company’s uranium recovery facilities, said he registered “strong concerns” about the 2010 deal with President Barack Obama. He said he now believes the response he received, and the “process” through which he received it, were “misleading.” He notes that in March of 2011, then-NRC Chairman Greg Jaczko said that neither Uranium One nor the subsidiary of the Russian-government-owner Rosatom held the necessary export license to ship U.S. uranium out of the country.
That assessment was repeated in the NRC’s recommendation to approve the Uranium One sale. However, beginning in 2012, Uranium One was able to begin exporting uranium without an export license in a move called “piggy-backing,” where it was listed merely as a supplier on another company’s export license. However, that uranium that left the country was supposed to return for “future processing.”
Not only did that uranium leave the U.S., but it was eventually exported out of Canada (the place that domiciles a branch of the Clinton Foundation). (Excerpt) Read more at trunews.com ...
Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra is one of the Clinton Foundation’s largest donors. Giustra's $100 million contributions go directly: (1) to the tax-exempt Clinton Foundation, and, (2) to the Canada-based "Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Partnership." The "Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Partnership" in turn sends money to the Clinton Foundation......(according to Canadian tax records researched by "Clinton Cash" author Schweizer).

DATA Sources: Clinton Foundation, CGEP (Canada); Canadian tax records; compiled by Alberto Cuadra and Rosalind Helderman May 3 at 8:11 PM
ARTICLE LINK http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/wealthy-canadian-helps-fund-the-clinton-foundation/2015/05/03/f855ea22-f1ea-11e4-90bc-afe06f530791_graphic.html

Frank Giustra with former Pres Bill Clinton during a NY press conference
announcing the Clinton foundation's new sustainable development initiative
in Latin America (largely in Colombia). The Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth
Initiative based in Canada got Giustra's pledge of a minimum of $100 million.
(June 21, 2007).
(Hah. No one is "that altruistic," Mr Giustra. What was your ROR?)
BACKSTORY---How Clinton used his presidency AND OUR TAX DOLLARS to get-rich-quick.
WIKI --- In 2000, then Pres Clinton showered Colombia with tax dollars:
<><> Clinton committed $1.3 billion in foreign aid and up to five hundred military personnel to train local forces.
<><>An additional three hundred civilian personnel were allowed to assist in the eradication of coca.
<><> Clinton's aid was an addition to US$330 million of previously approved US aid to Colombia. US$818 million was earmarked for 2000, with US$256 million for 2001.
<><> Clinton's appropriations for the plan made Colombia the third largest recipient of foreign aid from the United States at the time, behind only Israel and Egypt.
NOTE: Clinton and Giustra also started an equity fund in Colombia---but closed it down after it became public.
And now we hear that the Russians have perfected a giant EMP weapon. Thanks Hillary and Bill, Can you imagine the blood of millions of dead American men, women and children on their hands? (Here’s a clue, they laugh at the prospect, and they couldn’t care less..)
The clintons are filth.
“The FBI has refused to make important documents public.”
Who’s worse, the Clintons or the FBI?
That’s a tough one.......
.
Dirty beyond belief.. a pox on both Houses.. self-serving autocrats who spend like fiends, beg and then steal from taxpayers, get rich off insider trading,
Hey, who wouldn’t want to be a member of the largest organized crime syndicate on the globe?
Keep rolling over on your back America.
Let them scratch you behind your ears and massage your brain lobes with some more lies.. You seem to tolerate it so well.
Dirty beyond belief.. a pox on both Houses.. self-serving autocrats who spend like fiends, beg and then steal from taxpayers, get rich off insider trading,
Hey, who wouldn’t want to be a member of the largest organized crime syndicate on the globe?
Keep rolling over on your back America.
Let them scratch you behind your ears and massage your brain lobes with some more lies.. You seem to tolerate it so well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.