It’s not just D.
It’s D3, zinc, an ionophore like HCQ (anti-parasitic) or Ivermectin(anti-viral/anti-parsitic) or maybe Quercetin, and an antibiotic. HCQ and Zinc also help control inflammation which is a major effect of any infection and what generally sends covid19 infected to the hospital.
I’m tired of all these ‘studies’ that use only one element of the regimen, or use them in different ways e.g. giving them to people when it is way too late. Treat a disease before it gets out of hand not after they are hospitalized by it. I’m not saying they are guaranteed to work, just saying that the studies trying to appear as if they don’t work seem way more flawed than any of the studies showing they do.
correction, HCQ and Ivermectin have anti-inflammatory properties (not HCQ and Zinc as I wrote above).
Couldn't agree with you more. So many studies look at one drug or supplement in isolation and often use it at inappropriate stages of the disease, then declare "XYZ is useless." We saw that time and again with HCQ. That infuriates me.
I started the full recommended prophylaxis treatment shortly after Dr. Roger Seheult released his "Coronavirus Update 59: Dr. Roger Seheult's Daily Regimen (Vitamin D, C, Zinc, Quercetin, NAC)" on April 21, 2020. Almost the same recommendations were in the EVMS COVID Protocol at the time, too, and other doctors were beginning to make the same recommendations.
It would be real illuminating to see the results of a retrospective study of COVID cases and deaths for people who have been on this prophylaxis protocol for the past six to twelve months.
But how would you get results desired, if you don't construct a weak study.