Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DEPcom

All crap.

If China takes out our surface naval vessels with thousands of lives lost (they can) it will go nuclear before sundown. Just one boomer sub can take out all of China as a functioning society. It will then descend into internal warfare as we drop nukes on them. They willl drop nukes on us also. Neither wants this and both are rational.

It will not happen.


8 posted on 03/10/2021 7:09:13 PM PST by cpdiii (Texan Coonass Cane Cutter Deckhand Roughneck Geologist Pilot Phamacist. CONSTITUTION TO DIE FOR. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cpdiii

True. The balloon going up would be bad.

The planet is under siege, though.

Interesting times.


17 posted on 03/10/2021 7:17:54 PM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii

Yep, we’d unleash waves of lesbians followed by a few transgender divisions. Those yellow 🐀 rats would surrender in a snap.


18 posted on 03/10/2021 7:18:08 PM PST by JonPreston (Q: Never have so many, been so wrong, so often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii

President Harris would authorize a nuclear response?

Uh, no.


19 posted on 03/10/2021 7:18:10 PM PST by Regulator (It's Fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii

“it will go nuclear before sundown.”

The current US leadership will never launch a nuclear weapon first. China knows this. The US government is a paper tiger with neuter balls. Sorry but the US government is not the same government you knew many years ago.

“Neither wants this and both are rational.”
China does not respect life and will use Nukes, they do not care if their own citizens are nuke. China is not rational they want world domination. If they think they can get an advantage by launching first they will launch.


26 posted on 03/10/2021 7:21:57 PM PST by DEPcom (Impeach Illegitimate Biden/Harris )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii

If China takes out our surface naval vessels with thousands of lives lost (they can) it will go nuclear before sundown.


If the mood strikes him.


39 posted on 03/10/2021 7:29:55 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii
"If China takes out our surface naval vessels with thousands of lives lost (they can) it will go nuclear before sundown."

I'm not so sure.. The left does despise the military and I don't think they have a better opinion of Taiwan. And they hate the idea of ANYTHING nuclear... Why, that would dirty the planet, don't you know.. /s

40 posted on 03/10/2021 7:30:41 PM PST by unread (A REPUBLIC..! If you can keep it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii

Nope. Wrong. There is no scenario where belligerent that possessing nuclear weapons pulls the trigger first. Not going to happen.


49 posted on 03/10/2021 7:35:54 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii

“...and both are rational.”

What do you base your assumption on?


51 posted on 03/10/2021 7:36:21 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii

Red China can lose 500,000,000 and not break a sweat. Red China could lose 500,000,000 and really not care. Death to them means nothing.


52 posted on 03/10/2021 7:36:52 PM PST by Thumper1960 (Trump-2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii
I agree with you and have a bit to add...

China, or any country in this scenario is by definition attacking the US using Weapons of Mass Destruction aka WMDs. The default upon usage of WMDs against the US is to respond in kind. That means a massive nuke counter strike sending the adversary back to the Stone Age.

Question... Would a D President (ex. Biden/Harris) have the cahones to do this or wimp out?

64 posted on 03/10/2021 7:47:55 PM PST by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii
That both sides are rational is up for debate. Xi is looking to permanent Han supremacy and his place in history. More than just a little megalomania there.

Those behind the Biden clownworld are driven by the intoxication of power. They are in love with death.

88 posted on 03/10/2021 8:18:26 PM PST by Noumenon (The Second Amendment exists primarily to deal with those who just won't take no for an answer. KTF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii

Will we even have nukes in a few years and will they even work. Wouldn’t put it past the traitors in office from divulging locations and tactics of our submarines and also our early warning system.


93 posted on 03/10/2021 8:23:25 PM PST by BillyCuccio (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii

Also, we often forget that India, Japan, and maybe South Korea might have something to say about a sudden Chinese military offensive. And if it escalated, we have numerous well-armed allies, while China has a bunch of third-world s**holes that can’t do squat, and perhaps Iran. Russia?...maybe, but I’m not convinced that they would risk their own territory for China. In fact, Russia might be more likely to join in against China, if they’re smart. Jump in while everyone is pummeling the bully who lives next door before that bully can turn on you, which he inevitably will otherwise.


133 posted on 03/11/2021 1:26:52 AM PST by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii

If the policy is the same as when Obama was in office, we will not launch a nuclear attack even in response to a nuclear attack. Barack Obama took the use of nuclear arms off the table.


136 posted on 03/11/2021 1:37:43 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Lean on Joe Biden to follow Donald Trump's example and donate his annual salary to charity. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii

NBC — as in Nuclear, BIOLOGICAL & Chemical. Have been at the crux of war planning for over 50 years. I hardly think that the Chinese are going to do something that the Soviets refused to do.

I think the opening gambit to seize Taiwan will be information & economic based. As Biden & Nancy are busy spending our grandchildren into the poor house I hardly think the Chinese will have much heavy-lifting to do.


144 posted on 03/11/2021 2:51:27 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii

They willl drop nukes on us also. Neither wants this and both are rational.


There are people on this forum who think nuking China is a great idea, and when told they will be nuked in return say, “Can’t get to the Pearly Gates soon enough.”


162 posted on 03/11/2021 5:07:55 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii

I think China is rational. I’m not so sure about us. From the outside, does the election of Biden, Trump’s treatment, etc. all look rational to any other head of state?


166 posted on 03/11/2021 5:28:20 AM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii
It will then descend into internal warfare as we drop nukes on them. They willl drop nukes on us also. Neither wants this and both are rational.

If humans were rational, they wouldn't build nuclear weapons in the first place.

172 posted on 03/11/2021 5:36:28 AM PST by Flick Lives (“Today we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii

“It will not happen.“

It wasn’t logical either for Japan to attack Pearl Harbor.
They just didn’t realize until 1945.
But they did it anyway.


195 posted on 03/11/2021 6:41:44 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (Leave me alone, I have no incriminating evidence on the Clintons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson