To: CondoleezzaProtege
2 posted on
03/10/2021 10:49:43 AM PST by
Red Badger
("We've always been at war with Climate Change, Winston."..............................)
To: CondoleezzaProtege
4 posted on
03/10/2021 10:52:17 AM PST by
goodnesswins
(The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution." -- Saul Alinksy)
To: CondoleezzaProtege
So it was the engine rather than the aircraft. Faulty design? Faulty materials? Faulty assembly? Faulty maintenance? Or was a combination of two or more of these things?
To: CondoleezzaProtege
"According to the NTSB, about four minutes after takeoff, as the plane flew through 12,500 feet mean sea level (MSL) "
Which at that moment was only about 7,500 feet above the dirt below and not enough to clear the mountains in front of him!!!
8 posted on
03/10/2021 10:56:48 AM PST by
G Larry
(Authority is vested in those to whom it applies.)
To: CondoleezzaProtege; All
Can anyone shed light on whether the lack of debris entering the cabin or the nearby fuel tank was random luck? It looks like debris blew somewhat down and out the right (outside) area of the nacelle.
18 posted on
03/10/2021 11:29:36 AM PST by
SaxxonWoods
(The Republican Party is dead. Long live the MAGA Party.)
To: CondoleezzaProtege
Some P&W engine testing is done on software operated by a sketchy sub-contractor in East Hartford who hires illegal aliens with aerospace bachelors degrees would be my educated guess.
To: CondoleezzaProtege
A similar really scary incident happened in 2018 on a B777 flight that was 200 miles out of Hawaii when the blade blew:
https://youtu.be/NDLqxaSwPYM
23 posted on
03/10/2021 11:32:15 AM PST by
willk
(A bias news media is not a free press.)
To: CondoleezzaProtege
25 posted on
03/10/2021 11:37:42 AM PST by
RckyRaCoCo
(Please Pray For My Brother Ken.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
