Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meghan Laments She ‘Didn’t Want to Be Alive Anymore’ After Joining the Royal Family(Barf O rama!)
breitbart.com ^ | 3/8/2021 | Simon Kent

Posted on 03/08/2021 7:28:21 AM PST by rktman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
.


61 posted on 03/08/2021 11:16:22 AM PST by polymuser (A socialist is a communist without the power to take everything from their citizens...yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

.....with millions of black people starving world-wide and hundreds upon hundreds of blacks being shot in Democratic Party Run cities, black Oprah puts these two whiny, snotty, miscreant losers on world wide TV.


62 posted on 03/08/2021 11:21:07 AM PST by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cen-Tejas

Wonder if they had 80 million viewers? 😲🙌


63 posted on 03/08/2021 11:39:12 AM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
To say that Dianna was foisted on Charles grossly overstates the matter. How many people in this life get to marry "the One" of their dreams? Charles' first choice, the eager and slutty Camilla, was already married, while Charles' position required that he get married and produce an heir before his age made siring and properly rearing children implausible.

With royal dynastic demands and the biological clock impinging upon Charles, he had to marry someone, so Dianna it was. Beautiful, willing, and suitable for the roles of motherhood and princess, a genuinely loving marriage would have remedied her defects of temperament and personality -- if Charles had stuck around and been loyal instead of flitting off to Camilla at every opportunity.

Silly Dianna -- she and the British public thought that marriage into the British royal family meant the sort of middle class domesticity that Britain's modern royal family had made their trademark. Dianna and the British public fell for the con. The cheated on Dianna then took up the role of wronged woman, with Charles and the royal family as the wrongdoers.

As for the scheming Meghan, she thought the adulation that Dianna got would be hers for the asking. Finding otherwise, Meghan has taken up Dianna's role as wronged woman, but with little justification.

Worse, the more one sees of Meghan, the less one sees of Dianna and the more one sees Meghan as being like the scheming, stylish, and domineering Wallis Simpson. She too took her prince into a wealthy and comfortable exile and was estranged from the royal family to the end of her days. The unfortunate Prince Edward was said to be uxoriously attentive to Wallis, a broken man by the end.

64 posted on 03/08/2021 11:50:50 AM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

65 posted on 03/08/2021 11:55:40 AM PST by littleharbour ("You take on the intel community they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you" C. Schumer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

foisted is the right word . he didnt want her. remember his infamous response to the question if they were love

something like “whatever that is’


66 posted on 03/08/2021 12:06:00 PM PST by RummyChick (To President Trump: https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3923111/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

It was not so much that Dianna was foisted on Charles as that for compelling reasons, marriage was foisted on him. Charles might have chosen someone else and, with an entire Palace bureaucracy and extended family eager to help, there were many possible choices. Charles was no doubt repeatedly offered marriage candidates and told something along the lines of “You have to get married, so man up, pick one, and get to it.” Considering that Charles had many wealthy, well-bred, and attractive young women available, it is hard for me to see him as a put-upon victim on whom a bride was “foisted.”


67 posted on 03/08/2021 12:39:03 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Markle took a test to work at State but didn’t pass it


68 posted on 03/08/2021 1:12:54 PM PST by NEPA (Repeal the 17th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Meg is black and American at that. Even in America she was incapable of assimilation. The African blood kept her out


69 posted on 03/08/2021 1:16:24 PM PST by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) History: Pelosi was pitiful vindictive California crone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Meggie thinks it is actual history

70 posted on 03/08/2021 1:18:25 PM PST by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) History: Pelosi was pitiful vindictive California crone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

Read a review of that yesterday. Basically an apology sequel to the first one and apparently not that funny.


71 posted on 03/08/2021 1:43:49 PM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: rktman

CBS paid 7 million for that?


72 posted on 03/08/2021 1:44:27 PM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Weld, well........ Coming to America is a fantastic satirical trashing of Africanist Americans that dreamed up royalty that never existed.

In a poll of black mall patrons, 83% did not know who was the President of Africa


73 posted on 03/09/2021 6:06:53 AM PST by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) History: Pelosi was pitiful vindictive California crone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: bert

Well crap. Guess as a white dude(I know, shame on me) I can’t say as I know who the president of africa is either. :-) LOL!


74 posted on 03/09/2021 6:55:53 AM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson