You appear to be brainwashed. Have you read any Q posts? Can you verify a Q quote advocating any violence?
Here is what I think you should consider. Qanon theorists are whomever the corrupt media designates. Quite possibly FReepers will soon be labeled Qanon theorists. This is a common practice in tyrannies.
Buckle up, bunkie; we are in for a rough ride where truth will be a cheap commodity.
That has happened in the past. The Dan Rather story on GWB and the Texas Air National Guard was questioned, and FR was identified as the origin of the questioning.
Before that, in earlier days of FR, the Clinton Body Count and the Clinton Chronicles.
The Vince Foster conspiracy theory ... the list is pretty long.
How much is true, how much is false?
As for whatever it is that "Q" posits, don't take it from the press. They always get the crux of the story wrong.
You appear to be brainwashed.
Let us examine the facts. Q said Trump would remain President and be re-inaugurated on January 20. When that didn't happen Q said the re-inauguration would happen on March 4. That also didn't happen. Q also said many prominent Democrats would be arrested. Didn't happen. When a given source continues to be wrong I stop treating that source as credible. What do you do sir?
Have you read any Q posts?
Yes, I have read a few Q droppings. The name is quite fitting.
Can you verify a Q quote advocating any violence?
Can you show me where in my post I said there was a Q quote advocating any violence?