You appear to be brainwashed.
Let us examine the facts. Q said Trump would remain President and be re-inaugurated on January 20. When that didn't happen Q said the re-inauguration would happen on March 4. That also didn't happen. Q also said many prominent Democrats would be arrested. Didn't happen. When a given source continues to be wrong I stop treating that source as credible. What do you do sir?
Have you read any Q posts?
Yes, I have read a few Q droppings. The name is quite fitting.
Can you verify a Q quote advocating any violence?
Can you show me where in my post I said there was a Q quote advocating any violence?
It might surprise you to know that I did not follow Q for his 'predictions'; those prove normal human fallibility. I know some put high stock in them - a matter of choice.
***Can you show me where in my post I said there was a Q quote advocating any violence?***
My argument is against the article which evinces a classic symptom of growing autocratic rule... using the term 'Q theorists' thus creating a class that needs to be suppressed. The same charge could be made against those that 'follow the Bible' or 'follow John Paul Sartre' or 'follow the Farmers almanac.' It is an ignorant way to classify people. Within that class will be a wide number of variations, not an autonomous obedient group marching to orders from on high.
There are numerous 'trolls' that now invade the Q thread to continuously charge us with our stupidity. Obviously it is people who have nothing better to do with their lives that are stupid... such is human nature and ever more shall be so.
I perhaps overstated my frustration in charging you with possible brainwashing. Every troll invading the Q thread assumes that their view of Q IS what Q is about. As I say, I follow Q for a different reason and I feel no need to justify or explain it to anyone. Sorry for the remark, although I point out that I did NOT say that you ARE brainwashed... like Q I am just challenging you to think for yourself. ;^)